Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dear SaintJ


Lumps

Recommended Posts

Like I said, it's more funny because your fans are notorious for excusing that type of play when it's about hitting Favre low, twisting Adrian Peterson's ankle in the pile, cheap shotting players after they score a TD (Harper on Smitty), or going for a helmet to helmet hit (Sharper on Johnathan Stewart last year). You dudes had a collective orgasm when Gregg Williams came out and said you were trying to hit people after the play - but NOW other teams are dirty for doing it.

truth.. Saints fans are laughable..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spending a high pick on a back unless he's just an out of this world talent generally isn't the greatest value.

poo let alone spending two firsts on one.

Whoever drafts Trent Richardson this year will be getting a back that will have success in the NFL. Richardson was always the better back in that backfield even when Ingram was there.

I always thought the Ingram Heisman was a joke not only because he wasn't even the best player on his own team (Rolando McClain, Terrence Cody, and Javier Arenas were more important to that team), he wasn't even the best RUNNING BACK on that team (Richardson was).

I laughed when the Saints fans jumped for joy when they drafted Ingram.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, remember when Saints fans were all about "bad-ass play" the year they were hitting Favre low in the playoffs, when Sharper took a helmet-to-helmet shot on Stewart last year, and when Harper protected the endzone by cheap shotting Smitty. My how things change

That hit on Pierre Thomas was helmet-to-helmet only because the defender (as defenders are taught to do) got low to make the tackle and Thomas (as running backs are taught to do) got low to take the hit. Because of this, the contact ended up being helmet-to-helmet. There was absolutely no intent by the defender outside of tackling the guy... the helmet-to-helmet was due to incidental circumstance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...