Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good news from Jax.

Ruff

By Ruff,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

It makes perfect sense. The Panthers top 3 picks from the last 2 drafts are QB's. 2 of them are completely useless & a waste of a high draft pick/roster spot.

Armanti Edwards played QB in middle school, high school, & college. Drafting him & putting WR beside his name doesn't magically make him a WR.

Sure it does.....just Joshua Cribbs, Elderman, etc are NOT QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MWCarolina Newbie

MWCarolina

Posted
Posted

:confused:

Armanti Edwards

Jimmy Clausen

Cam Newton

Armanti Edwards was a QB that they drafted to play WR NOT QB, i dont care if he was a college and high school QB, he was drafted to play WR. Remember Matt Jones???? people didnt say he's a QB when he was drafted because it was made clear he was drafted to play WR.

As for Jimmy Clausen, you must've forgot the read the key word that was TRADE. the Jaguars TRADED what ended up being Ryan Kerrigan (real good pass rusher) and Jarvis Jenkins (got hurt, but has potential) for Blaine Gabbert, the panthers gave up nothing for Clausen, they sat back, waited and took Clausen, gave up on him in one year and then had the top pick, did their homework and took Newton, this is NOT the same as Jacksonville and Gabbert. Clausen was a 2nd round pick, Gabbert was a 1st round pick that they traded up for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaPanthers8789 Newbie

CarolinaPanthers8789

Posted
Posted

It makes perfect sense. The Panthers top 3 picks from the last 2 drafts are QB's. 2 of them are completely useless & a waste of a high draft pick/roster spot.

Armanti Edwards played QB in middle school, high school, & college. Drafting him & putting WR beside his name doesn't magically make him a WR.

It does when he can't see over the entire offensive line. It also doesn't make sense because we didn't spend a top 10 pick on Jimmy Clausen or trade up for him. We also didn't trade up for Newton.

Therefore picking QB's in consecutive drafts at picks 1 overall and 48 overall are nowhere near comparable to taking a qb 10th overall and 7th or higher overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MWCarolina Newbie

MWCarolina

Posted
Posted

It does when he can't see over the entire offensive line. It also doesn't make sense because we didn't spend a top 10 pick on Jimmy Clausen or trade up for him. We also didn't trade up for Newton.

Therefore picking QB's in consecutive drafts at picks 1 overall and 48 overall are nowhere near comparable to taking a qb 10th overall and 7th or higher overall.

Thank you! that's the point i was trying to make. while yes, it hurt drafting Clausen and it was a bad 2nd round pick (one that i didnt think would be bad) it is NOT the same as trading up from pick 17 to 10 and getting a QB then quitting on him in a year and trading up again (which to get RG3, they would have to do).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...