Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BCS NCG: Bama vs LSU


HeatCheck

Recommended Posts

Not what I said and you know it as well as I do. Keep cowering from the facts, bro.

What facts have you used? You've stated over and over again that Alabama and LSU are without a doubt the two best teams in the nation.....there is absolutely no way to know that if they don't have to play another deserving team like OSU. Like I said, I never once said they weren't great teams, they are. But that doesn't mean OSU couldn't beat them, which is exactly what you're claiming could never happen, that's not a fact BRO, that's an opinion.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only fact anyone needs to know is Alabama is the national champs! Love it and embrace it! Roll Tide! /thread

I can live with that, and don't dispute their championship. What I can't live with is people claiming they know for a fact how a game that has never been played would go down.....

Glad Saban won and not Miles to be completely honest.....congrats Bama fans on the title......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What facts have you used? You've stated over and over again that Alabama and LSU are without a doubt the two best teams in the nation.....there is absolutely no way to know that if they don't have to play another deserving team like OSU. Like I said' date=' I never once said they weren't great teams, they are. But that doesn't mean OSU couldn't beat them, which is exactly what your claiming could never happen, that's not a fact BRO, that's an opinion.....[/quote']

I don't know if you are too stupid to not understand it or if you just don't want to because you haven't devised some stupid argument to counter it yet.

As it has been said, over and over and over and over again, within the last five pages of this thread. This has nothing to do with the BCS. Absolutely nothing.

Nobody is saying that they like the system. What is being said is that the system worked last night. The two best teams played, and only an annoying minority who can't stand when people don't like their teams are the only ones who expected a playoff to be instituted midseason to appease them.

Is the system broken? I won't even give you an answer to that-because it's irrelevant.

But as long the system is the way it is now, the experts are forced to pick the two best teams and have them play for a national title. Last night's game proved they got it right this year.

You certainly could not have taken LSU out of the game, they were undefeated, they were the best team in the nation. There isn't two teams in the nation better than they are, they are that good. It isn't about numbers and rankings and all the other crap you are using to perpetuate your hopeless argument-it's about professionals looking at the teams and recognizing that they are superior.

There is only one this season that has proved they are better-I'm sure I don't have to tell you who that is. The two best teams played last night.

Can anything happen any given day? Yes. But, let me emphasize so I don't have to hear the same stupid argument which has already been dispelled so many times in this thread-The system doesn't work that way right now and it wasn't going to be changed midseason to make sure you were happy

I challenge you to make one argument that doesn't revolve around that tired line "but we'll never know for sure!!" because the BCS does not work that way.

Some times the system works, some times it does not. They got lucky and it worked last night because:

It's amazing that I have to continue to piece this together for you. That I have to make sure things stay fresh in your mind so you won't forget. I feel like I'm babysitting. Would you like some goldfish?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody can win on any given day, but the system played out as it was set up to. This argument happens just about every year, there probably will be some re-structuring after this year.

Would you really bet anything on this? Not after the system worked itself out.

Edited for accuracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

College football, where championships are decided by the eyeball test.....still 0 facts in anything you've stated to show that without a doubt OSU couldn't be the better team then either Bama or LSU on any given night....you can harp about what experts say about their personnel all you want, but that doesn't mean jack poo when the game actually starts. If it did, the Steelers would be in the playoffs still....no one is asking for the system to be changed midseason, we're saying that there's no way to know that Bama or LSU are the best team because they haven't had to play the other teams who deserved a shot. You know, kind of like when you said there's no way to know if USC was a good team after only playing one quality opponent....you can't have it both ways......

I don't have to make an argument about anything not pertaining to never knowing for sure, because that's exactly what I'm arguing. You stated last night that OSU would not beat either team, that's not a fact by any stretch of the imagination. That's an opinion.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

College football' date=' where championships are decided by the eyeball test.....still 0 facts in anything you've stated to show that without a doubt OSU couldn't be the better team then either Bama or LSU on any given night....you can harp about what experts say about their personnel all you want, but that doesn't mean jack poo when the game actually starts. If it did, the Steelers would be in the playoffs still....no one is asking for the system to be changed midseason, we're saying that there's no way to know that Bama or LSU are the best team because they haven't had to play the other teams who deserved a shot. You know, kind of like when you said there's no way to know if USC was a good team after only playing one quality opponent....you can't have it both ways......[/quote']

Ah yes, exactly as I predicted. I've a great track record here on the Huddle when making predictions. Looks like my win percentage just went up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing you have said-nothing has made any argument that LSU and Alabama shouldn't of been in the NCG.

I never said they didn't deserve to be there either, I said that the game was pathetic and in my opinion a high powered offense with good to great qb play like OSU's could have given either defense trouble.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said they didn't deserve to be there either' date=' I said that the game was pathetic and in my opinion a high powered offense with good to great qb play like OSU's could have given either defense trouble.....[/quote']

And Trent Richardson could have ran quite well against OSU, stranding Okie St's offense on the sideline.

Okie St. certainly wouldn't have shut down LSU like Alabama did.

I think a few key things are going on here:

A. You're using offense as a measure of great teams. You look at LSU and Alabama's offense and assumed similar results would have happened had they played OkSt. It wouldn't have. Both teams have good offenses. Which leads me to point two..

B. You're not factoring just how good those two defenses are-frankly they both may be one and two in comparison to any team in the last ten years. Bearing in mind that both teams have good offenses, these two defenses had their way with the opposing offenses last night. Defensive players were swarming on every single play. That certainly would not have come from Ok St.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never once said OSU would shut down LSU or Alabama, what I said was an offense with the explosive playmakers that OSU has could potentially give either defense some trouble. Obviously Alabama's running game would look better against the Pokes, and OSU would have to pick and choose their spots against an excellent Tide defense, but Brandon Weeden also wouldn't miss wide open receivers like JJ did. Just because you (or anyone else for that matter) state that OSU couldn't have beat Alabama doesn't mean it's a fact, or for that matter accurate....would Alabama give OSU all they could handle and maybe more, perhaps. But I also think Justin Blackmon would be a matchup nightmare for Dre Kirkpatrick. There's no way to know for sure beacause it never did, and never will happen. That's all I'm arguing, not that either team didn't deserve to be there, just that there's no way to claim it as a fact that either would have beat OSU or OSU would have beat either of them....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...