Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BCS NCG: Bama vs LSU

HeatCheck

By HeatCheck,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

GamecockSmitty4 Rising Star

GamecockSmitty4

Posted
Posted

This is what bothers me. USC that lost to ASU is a lot different then what we saw at the end of the season. Teams get hot and cold during the year just like the NFL. An early loss can kill a season when it shouldn't. Teams get better or worse through the year. I firmly believe USC that we saw at the end of November would easily compete with LSU.

Actually I would much rather lose early in the season rather than late in the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

The real USC? Please don't start this argument. USC was a school before Cal was a state.

As for scheduling an FCS team...they don't have to. They play in a conference with 10 of them.

har har har....you so funny....let me guess this is where you chant SEC, SEC till you're blue in the face. Sorry, conference pride is for losers...I could care less what other Pac teams do, I'm not going to root for my rivals to play well...that's pathetic.....

oh and btw, Oregon, Stanford and USC would dismantle South Carolina.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeatCheck Newbie

HeatCheck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thats because this was a unusally bad year for the SEC. I watched the SEC this year and the offenses were garbage...

Florida, Tennesse, Auburn, Ole Miss, Miss St, Kentucky, Vandy, all straight bad... You need good QB play and qb play was horrific in the SEC this year. That is why I believe they put up such good numbers cause they got to play bad offenses most of the year.

I am sure if you look at offensive numbers for the SEC, they will not be good at all... I am sure the stats will match what my eyeballs saw.

Yeah but we aren't arguing what conference is better. People are arguing if OSU or Bama is a better team.

You have to take into account both sides of the ball. Not only do you have to have a good QB but you also have to have a good defense to get a good view of how teams really are on offense. You can say the same thing about Big XII and their defenses inflating the stats of the QBs.

And when taking into account both sides of the ball Bama is a better, more well rounded team than OSU. They can put up points and play amazing defense. They had a higher point differential than OSU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat'sGrowl Newbie

Cat'sGrowl

Posted
Posted

har har har....you so funny....let me guess this is where you chant SEC, SEC till you're blue in the face. Sorry, conference pride is for losers...I could care less what other Pac teams do, I'm not going to root for my rivals to play well...that's pathetic.....

oh and btw, Oregon, Stanford and USC would dismantle South Carolina.....

Lol look at how emotionally unstable you are

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GamecockSmitty4 Rising Star

GamecockSmitty4

Posted
Posted

har har har....you so funny....let me guess this is where you chant SEC, SEC till you're blue in the face. Sorry, conference pride is for losers...I could care less what other Pac teams do, I'm not going to root for my rivals to play well...that's pathetic.....

oh and btw, Oregon, Stanford and USC would dismantle South Carolina.....

Personal attacks. Always a great way to add legitimacy to your argument. Not.

Stanford....not. Oregon..probably. SoCal..lol. The only team they played with half a defense "dismantled" them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Personal attacks. Always a great way to add legitimacy to your argument. Not.

Stanford....not. Oregon..probably. SoCal..lol. The only team they played with half a defense "dismantled" them.

tell me then, what corners do you have that would have been able to contain Robert Woods and Marqise Lee....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...