Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your mock draft


Brooklyn Bully

Recommended Posts

I don't care that you don't care.

Also, you do realize that Hurney and Rivera must create their own 'mock drafts' to see all the possible scenarios, and determine who might be available when they draft. Of course, they don't start doing that until after combine.. but all GM's must do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posting your own mock draft is like posting your fantasy team roster. You think it's an awesome shining beacon of your wonderous football IQ but typically is just great proof of how stupid you are, and, as UB said, noone ever cares.

I still enjoy whipping one up every and now and again, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posting your own mock draft is like posting your fantasy team roster. You think it's an awesome shining beacon of your wonderous football IQ but typically is just great proof of how stupid you are, and, as UB said, noone ever cares.

I still enjoy whipping one up every and now and again, though.

This guy sort of gets it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posting your own mock draft is like posting your fantasy team roster. You think it's an awesome shining beacon of your wonderous football IQ but typically is just great proof of how stupid you are, and, as UB said, noone ever cares.

I still enjoy whipping one up every and now and again, though.

The point of mock drafts is to go over potential scenarios to see whom we might draft. You must be interested in that too, otherwise you would not be 'whipping' one up every now and again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...