Panthers defensive MVP?

[Cold Cat]

I'm going to go with Gamble on this one.

Originally I wanted to go with Anderson. The reason I picked Gamble over Anderson is the reason many of you picked Anderson.

Injuries. Anderson had more oppurtunities to shine with our Core LBrs taken out. Gamble was expected to do his job. In my eyes he went further than I thought he could by locking down some very talented recievers and cutting the field in half. Only if the rest of our secondary could cover half a field.

[4Corners]

It's Gamble.

[Ken]

Should have used a poll....

Anyway Gamble for me.

[Jackofalltrades]

Co MVP's.

[Car123]

:confused:

It insists upon itself

[The_Cannon]

Martin...without him we'd have nothing to bi*ch about

[CRA]

Martin...without him we'd have nothing to bi*ch about

did you forget about the horrific DT, LB, and S (both) play most of the year. Oh yeah, the weak #2 CB play as well?

we were horrible against the run b/c of our rookie DTs..they were only part of it. We were gashed on the outside b/c of horrible LB and S play.

[CharlotteBeer.com]

I think even the guys who were out there would tell you they sorely missed Jon Beason.

Of the choices here, I'd go with Gamble.

Of course they would. I'm not denying that.

I'm just saying it's foolish to declare Beason as the defensive most valuable player when he didn't even play.

I hate the Manning for MVP argument for the same reason.

[Carolina Fan]

Anderson played like a leader this year, but gamble played better i think.

[Zithers]

chris gamble

charles johnson as runner up

[Urrymonster]

Gamble or CJ, definitely not Anderson.

[beastson]

Andersen.

[Tarheels23]

Anderson, he broke Beason's single season tackling record.

[Seal (SmittyIsOurSavior)]

Co-Winners.