Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lol gamble is basically having as good a year as revis


Fiz

Recommended Posts

First off, I like Gamble a lot, always have.

That said, it's kinda like the Champ Bailey thing in Denver, and until this season the Jammer thing in SD. If the rest of the secondary is below average, or bad, why in the world throw to the one shining spot.

Why exactly would that make opposing QBs have a low QB rating when throwing to him?

You'd think if that were true, opposing QBs would have a decent QB rating when throwing to his coverage but just wouldn't go to him very often.

Not only do they not target him often, they have an awful rating when they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why exactly would that make opposing QBs have a low QB rating when throwing to him?

You'd think if that were true, opposing QBs would have a decent QB rating when throwing to his coverage but just wouldn't go to him very often.

Not only do they not target him often, they have an awful rating when they do.

I don't think I understand what you are saying.

Gamble is a really good CB, QB's would just rather throw against Capt..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I understand what you are saying.

Gamble is a really good CB, QB's would just rather throw against Capt..

Click the link and read before you post.

This is based on qb rating when thrown at. Whether or not they're picking on captain, gamble is still holding it down when they do challenge him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it will be a transition year will be a playoff team (more grindy and young blood) but not a top contender... but in 25-26 back to being a contender IMO Nickishin will be ready to do day 1 IMO.... and if we can get some of these young guys the experience/development FUS/Blake/Nadeu/Morrow 
    • in itself i didn't/don't have an issue with this. And our main point has always been that we didn't want to be one of the go for it all teams at the deadline because we have a window that has term with Slavin/Aho/Svech/Jarvy.  however. keeping martinook above market value and not combining the youth influx with things like changing things at goalie and or signing a big name as a guentz replacement just feels like so far we're kind of sitting this out, and i really dont like the idea of taking a large step backwards from pre deadline roster last year. i understand we've given this a run with the same guys and it hasn't worked and changing some things there. but we also know exactly what our glaring issues are. so to not get better at those while also getting worse/losing big time names in other areas is pretty disheartening thus far. Hope there's more to come.
    • It looks like next year is going to be the year that a lot of young guys get a chance.
×
×
  • Create New...