Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What the heck, NFL apparel?


Jase

Recommended Posts

I put on my new panthers pajama pants tonight. Now I've had 2-3 other panthers pajama pants in my life. They've all been comfortable and of high quality. They give plenty of room to go freeballin' around the house whenever I want.

To my surprise, I put on my new pants only to find that the fly doesn't have a button. Like it's too expensive now to put a button on some pajama pants.

The next group of girl scouts to ring my doorbell are in for a real treat.

:leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're 27 and have only had 2-3 pairs of pajama pants in your entire life? You poor thing.

Less clothes are better!

I ordered a jacket and that scarf/hoodie thingy on the website and it arrived today.

XS Women's Jacket and its still big on me.....still fits but its big.

I think the NFL assumes all women that love football are large and chubby.

This is again, why I need the rights to design my own women's line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...