Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Numbers that should be retired...


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

I realize as a matter of practice that the Panthers do not believe in retiring numbers, and part of me likes this as a symbol that this organization values the team above any individual player, but ultimatley I think this young organization would derive greater benefit from the pride and tradition the retiring of numbers creates. Here's my list of numbers that should be retired by the Panthers:

51 = Sam Mills obviously, word is that this number is unofficially retired.

58 = Mark Fields, was a significant contributor and was ultimatley forced to retire due to a potentially life-threatening illness. Didn't like seeing Davis pick this number right up and run with it, Fields will never say this but I'm sure it hurt.

30 = Mike Minter, Panthers "lifer" who was a significant contributor. I think anyone who spends the entirety of a long career with the Panthers while contributing at a high-level should be in consideration for having their number retired. Feels odd seeing Godfrey run around out there with it.

93 = Mike Rucker, see Minter above.

4 = Kasay, the original Panther, nuff said.

Others?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kasay, maybe..maybe.

That should be reserved for Great players....not good ones.

If Smith plays for another 7-8 years at a high level, I could see his retired....possibly.

Totally agree about Smith in another few years but all of the other players mentioned should be in a 'Ring of Honor'......but not having their numbers retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fred Lane--- seriously ..... wtf?

RETIRED????

I agree with Kasay & mills for obvious reasons.

Well, I was thinking Fred Lane because he had such a promising start with the Panthers but then I read the wiki article about him - wasn't aware of all the personal bad stuff he had going on... and forgot that we actually traded him to the Colts, so I retract that nomination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None. There is nobody who has played here that is even worthy of the hall of fame, let alone jersey retirement. We have had great players at the end of their careers. But they weren't here long enough for jersey retirement consideration. Just my opinion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kasay has a shot at hall numbers

386/473 81.6 percent 1634 points, 11th all time in points.

He'll move into the top ten next season and end up in 8th place at the end of the season. Two or three more years and he would be in the top 5 in points, FG's and FG's Attempted. He could end up being as high as third on the all time Kicker points list.

He definitely deserves it when he retires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think retired jerseys should be for those folks who help the team win a championship or transformed the teams identity.

Agree 100%. Walter Payton, Johnny Unitas, Jim Brown, etc. Those are guys that need jerseys retired. Just because a guy is an above average player and has a long career doesn't mean he should get his number retired (Minter, Rucker, kasay). Jersey retirement should be for all time greats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tell me what type of QB they were especially year2? 
    • IMO Xavier Legette: Very up and down season, with more downs than ups. The hands/body catcher thing is a MASSIVE red flag. He has all the talent in the world but if you are this deficient in your fundamentals, it is a very steep learning curve at this level. I suspect we are going to be talking about him as another failed Panthers WR pick in another season or two. Jonathan Brooks: What more could be said that hasn't already been said? I feel for the kid but taking a RB in the 2nd round is not smart. Taking a RB coming off an ACL tear is WILDLY moronic. One of the worst draft decisions in the Tepper era. Trevin Wallace: A developmental pick taken a little higher than he should have been and inconsistent when he saw action. Overall, he showed some flashes and should be a part of our backup/rotation for another season or so to develop. Hopefully he becomes a starting caliber player by season three. JT Sanders: Terrible start to his rookie season that quickly evolved in a meteoric rise but subsequently fell off the map after a scary injury. Absolutely should be a featured player on this offense for years to come. Possibly the best TE since Greg retired.  The Rest: About as expected. Some decent flashes from Smith-Wade but these are all backup level players, so anything we get is great. There are no "busts" after the 4th round.
    • He's been excellent in both years, having to be the top target when he he has never been a true #1 in terms of ability.  
×
×
  • Create New...