Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers defense historically bad in loss


mav1234

Recommended Posts

Not that we needed the records to tell, but...

josephperson Joe Person

The 49 points allowed were the third-most in Panthers' history -- 52 at Oakland (12/24/00) and 51 at Atl. (10/4/98).

josephperson Joe Person

Lions rack up 495 yards, the most ever allowed by the Panthers (493 vs. SLT in '01). Also, 29 first downs allowed team worst (28, Oak., '00)

We also gave up a career high 140 yards rushing to Kevin Smith, and he combined for another career high 200 total yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is Cam's fault of course, sitting on sidelines with his towel when he could've been playing DL or covering Calvin Johnson.

frankly we could have used him on DL I think. ;)

honestly CJ was contained well enough, 5 catches for 89 yards, no TDs. Still a good day for him but our real problem was our inability to stop the run at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets actually have good young talent, but they just can't play good team ball.   Lee doesn't look like a good hire at HC so far.
    • Apparently it did no good. Getting spanked by the Wizards…again!
    • I'd be looking at mid to late round QBs every single draft simply because the potential ROI is so high. Hell, even if I have an entrenched starter and backup that wouldn't change the equation. Hit on one and I'd trade my entrenched backup to a desperate team and now I have a quality backup in a rookie contract to protect cap space and a potential asset to trade down the road or hell even develop into a starter if my starter is aging or has a career detailing injury or maybe the young guy simply proves to be better at some point. Once you get the the 4th or 5th round you're basically throwing darts at the board hoping to hit on something at that point. Most of those guys will prove to not be long for the league anyway.  I'm not saying reach on a guy just because he's a QB but if I have similarly rated prospects on the board and we're talking about a FB, a blocking TE, and a  OG with limited upside, well that's a no brainer to me. Roll the dice on the QB.
×
×
  • Create New...