Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Tebow success get under Cam's skin


usmcpanthers

Recommended Posts

Chad Henne was asked to win games too.. doesn't mean he's not a game manager..

Here is a great audio clip about The Golden Calf of Bristol and says something I have been saying all along. The Golden Calf of Bristol is knocked because he plays in his own way unlike other QBs.. it's not game managing.. it's ultra efficiency but not just as a passer..

Considering that the Broncos could hold off teams like the Jets for almost 4 qrtrs until The Golden Calf of Bristol gets the ball and start running, says to me that defense wins games.

It's funny how those who want to minimize Cam talent to the level of Tim's is ignoring the Panthers defense. BTW, why are u folks not comparing Tim to his second year QBs why Cam? Are u still trying to make ur egos feel good by saying Tim is better than Cam as a QB? As a team, the Broncos are better than the Panthers. As individual QBs Cam is WAY better than Tim. Even with his Ints.

BTW, Cam and the Panthers have scored mored in today's game than Tim and the Broncos did their last two games combined, yet the Panthers lost...Once again solidifying the reality that DEFENSE WINS GAMES and offense just puts up points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet look at The Golden Calf of Bristol's TD to int ration.. much much better than Cam.. even with far less talent than Cam.

Peyton Manning and Brady don't have huge arms but they are much better than cam will ever be...

i am as much a The Golden Calf of Bristol fan as the next guy, BUT the reason The Golden Calf of Bristol's TD to int ratio is low is simple. The Golden Calf of Bristol's throws as so off that even the defender cant catch it, if you or ANYONE think The Golden Calf of Bristol is a better PASSING Quarterback, then you need to learn quarterbacking. The Golden Calf of Bristol is a better runner and the reason is because of his vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Golden Calf of Bristol is so much better than Cam, I'm still glad we got Cam though. Oh..btw, I still want us to draft Matt Barkley!!!

wow, you are glad we have Cam, but then say you want us to get Barkley!!??? that makes little to no sense. getting Barkley would just be a huge mistake and cause issues both with Barkley and Cam. As for The Golden Calf of Bristol being better than Newton, disagree, The Golden Calf of Bristol is a very raw passer, great runner.

He had no pass protection.. that is the Broncos weakness and the Lions strength. Cam has a dominant line around him.. at least early in the season he did. This is why it's siily to see people making excuses for Cam and not The Golden Calf of Bristol...Also, The Golden Calf of Bristol had no McGahee in that game.. The Golden Calf of Bristol's only decent runner.. and he's nowhere near Cam's runners level. No receivers.. no runners and a weak line..

First off, the Broncos offensive line is pretty decent. it's not great, but it's not bad. they have Clady still and Chris Kuper. they didnt have McGahee, but that doesnt excuse why The Golden Calf of Bristol was so off and i dont make excuses for Cam, those picks were bad, BUT in my book the defense was what played worse.

The Golden Calf of Bristol has a great passing TD to Int ratio... much much better than cam's.. it's that simple.

that alone doesnt make him a better quarterback, though it's part of it. The Golden Calf of Bristol has THAT part, BUT he isnt always going to have his defenses giving him pick sixes or have other offenses struggle or have the ball above the 50 half of the games. The Golden Calf of Bristol is a raw passer who just takes care of the ball by throwing it low or way too high. if he had just decent passing skills, then he would be a great QB, but as of now, he's a raw QB who needs to work on his passing to be taken more seriously because i am sure, sometime a team will figure out that they need to stop all the running lanes and force him to pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, you are glad we have Cam, but then say you want us to get Barkley!!??? that makes little to no sense. getting Barkley would just be a huge mistake and cause issues both with Barkley and Cam. As for The Golden Calf of Bristol being better than Newton, disagree, The Golden Calf of Bristol is a very raw passer, great runner.

I was just trolling Decleater since that's obvious what he wants. :D I wish he would just go ahead and admit it instead of trying to find any stat available that'll fit his agenda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just trolling Decleater since that's obvious what he wants. :D I wish he would just go ahead and admit it instead of trying to find any stat available that'll fit his agenda

oh, hahaha, ok. whoever wants that is stupid in my book. drafting a QB would be bad in many more ways than one. it would just put pressure on the said rookie to win now or lose his job in a year and there's enough pressure on rookie QBs anyway. if we do go offense, i still would like a WR, you can never have enough weapons on offense, i know what people will say, but having a Blackmon or Jeffery would be huge for us and make the offense more explosive and then look for ALOT of defense in free agency and in rounds 2-5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So nothing to do with the fact he has broken most rookie records for performance?

How many NFL records does The Golden Calf of Bristol have?

He has quite a few.. his first three games he had the most rushing yards of any QB in first three starts since the NFL merger...

There have been several other ones as well but I am forgetting them now.. in theJets game he had the longest TD run in the final minute of a game..

This gets back to my point.. if The Golden Calf of Bristol couldn't pass there is no way he and his team run as well as they have been.

If Cam COULD pass as well as people pretend he should be getting many more running TDs and winning games himself..

Something is rotten inDenmark..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I know is :

Green Bay versus Denver 49-23

Detroit Lions versus Denver 45- 10

It's not John Fox's defense. It's John Fox's efficient offenses that are winning with The Golden Calf of Bristol. They got blown out just as bad against the Lions as we did. Our defense held much better against Green Bay despite 4 turnovers. And we only got the score run up on us when Cam Newton threw 4 picks and the offense laid eggs all day long.

Whereas Denver, The Golden Calf of Bristol and Fox...

Denver vs Oakland 38-24

can put up 38 points on a team without ANY takeaways while throwing an interception. We can only put up 30 points on a team if we get 3 turnovers from our defense, and 7 points from special teams. John Fox knows how to have an efficient offense. We don't.

PS: I love how every member that doesn't agree with the majority gets negative repped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vs. Miami: 9 punts

Lions: 7 punts

Raiders: 5 punts

Chiefs: 7 punts

Jets: 8 punts

The Broncos offense is so efficient they miss opportunities on 7 drives a game

Has gone? It is has been there all week :lol: That is why I have stopped posting a bit in this thread.

I try but I keep seeing so much stupid poo I feel obligated to reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...