Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How well is butler playing?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Is he starter quality or a dimeback? From what i've seen he's been solid and certainly better than cap. The issue remains do we still need a cb? I think butler is good enuff that the need for a cb isnt top 3 anymore. With hogan waiting in the wings and a fiesty cap in his more natural spot were, atleast average. Unless we trade back i can't see a cb being selected in the first 2 rounds. Sure he had a few mistakes from time to time overall he's been a welcome additon. What say you???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not knowing what Hogan can do, I think we still need a starting caliber CB, but it is probably not a first round priority. If the best player when we pick is a corner though we have to take it. I would rank OLB and OL ahead of CB based on chronic injuries to Davis and Otah.

Basically, we don't need to reach for a corner in the draft, but we shouldn't pass over a corner that is BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Butler was playing at a very high level before he left the team to tend to family issues (his young daughter had heart surgery). He had some major break downs against the Vikings (it was he and Martin that gave up the early TD).

Given how well he played before he took his excused absence I am not overly concerned by his inconsistent play this past Sunday. I'm still holding out hope that we have a starting caliber guy in Butler. I think Gamble, Butler, Munnerlynn/Hogan is more than adequate.

This team needs a veteran d-lineman (DT or best option), a top tier LB (1st rd pick), a veteran S, a solid OG (FA or Draft), a solid OT prospect, a better FB (FA or Draft), and a K (sign someone off the street?) before we need a CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera never start Butler at the beginning of the game. It's tough to evaluate all of what he can do, when he only comes in on situational plays.

As for the corner situation as a whole, I think we need to draft a big corner to match Gamble on the other side of the ball. Fortunately, I think we will be able to draft Robert Blanton in the late rounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a Cov 2 (zone), Martin was late over the top. But let's not forget it was a perfect throw by Hasselbeck.

I think it was a cover 3 with Godfrey low to help out with Johnson. Explains why Martin was late and Butler was still trailing. In a cover 2 he would have been all alone with Martin or Butler was out of position. Oh and yes it was a nice throw as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...