Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers isn't fair


Swarly

Recommended Posts

I don't think I've ever seen a quarterback playing at his level before.

Yes, that includes 2007 Brady and 2003(or was it 2004?) Manning.

The guy is just UNfugINGREAL!

72.9% completion, 2,869 yards, 9.7 YPA, 28TD / 3INT, 130.7 QB rating

The 9.7 YPA is by FAR the most impressive to me. To have a 72.9% completion is absurd enough, but to do it while throwing down field and not just dink and dunking(I'm looking at you, Matt Ryan).. fug. We could be watching the greatest season by a quarterback in the history of the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have him on one of my five FF teams. The team has only won twice. :(

Sadly, he's not superman. Oddly, I have Cam on three of the teams and all three teams have seven wins thus far. :)

I am 7-3 with him on one of my fantasy teams. After Sun...I was behind by 27 points and between the 2 teams, there was only 1 player left to play. I had Rogers. He got 28 points and the win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I've ever seen a quarterback playing at his level before.

Yes, that includes 2007 Brady and 2003(or was it 2004?) Manning.

The guy is just UNfugINGREAL!

72.9% completion, 2,869 yards, 9.7 YPA, 28TD / 3INT, 130.7 QB rating

The 9.7 YPA is by FAR the most impressive to me. To have a 72.9% completion is absurd enough, but to do it while throwing down field and not just dink and dunking(I'm looking at you, Matt Ryan).. fug. We could be watching the greatest season by a quarterback in the history of the NFL.

Brady in 2007 was actually better (these stats through 8 games):

Yards: Rodgers: 2,619; Brady, 2,431

Touchdowns: Brady, 30; Rodgers, 24

Interceptions: Brady, 2; Rodgers, 3;

Completion percentage: Brady, 75.2; Rodgers, 72.5

OB rating: Brady, 131.1; Rodgers, 129.7

Yards per completion: Brady, 11.51; Rodgers, 9.88

This was addressed by king-douche Peter King last week http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/peter_king/11/08/week.9/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First I'll address Rodgers. The dude is on fire, but he did get to learn behind one of the best QB's of all time in Favre. A lot of his success stems from watching Favre do his thing. I mean when I sit down and watch him play, he plays just like Favre did. He's an extremely hard worker as well, and then the natural talent just puts people in awe. I'm not too sure what happened between him and Favre but it obviously wasn't good. It's a shame if you ask me.

Now in to GB's defense, or lack there of...

Anybody else think it's sad that WE have been the closest to beating them when we still had a pretty much injury free defense?? If they go on to be undefeated I'll literally throw up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As we look at these prospects, I can never quite grasp which “edge” projects as a 4-3 end and which projects as a 3-4 olb. Is there even a distinction anymore? I always think of the smaller Von Millers and Micah Parsons as the 3-4 OLB types and I’m thinking someone like Peppers as the 4-3 end but then I guess Peppers played OLB in GB.  It also seems like the OLBs end up walking up to the line half of the time.  Anyone have any tips on discerning the difference, especially in Evero’s defense?
    • Poor kid. Here's hoping he someday gets a chance. In the meantime, someone else will be getting an opportunity and hopefully they can make the most of it.  
    • This is it. The Panthers don't have the draft picks or salary cap to approach the offseason position-by-position. That's for teams much further along. They'll have to address "mission areas" rather than individuals, and they'll need to be creative rather than taking a linear approach. I'd add "improve the pass rush: as 1B with "improving the run defense" as 1A. Trying to upgrade every weak position is just not feasible. It'll take 2 or 3 great drafts. For instance, a guy like Luvu that can play the run and rush the QB would be huge in both areas. A fix? No. But a definite improvement. We're focused on a WR1, when a guy like CMC would provide a playmaking option that defenses will have to account for in the passing and running game. And I think an explosive playmaker is more important than adding another guy that can catch the ball in traffic. We have that in spades. Can't solve this riddle in one offseason without taking away from current areas of strength. It's a puzzle that won't be easy to solve. And they'll need to be future focused while being current competent.  My opinions/approach: I'm thinking the focus should be on defensive players that are good at both the run and pass pressure rather than specialists. A stout run-stopping OLB that can also pressure the QB is the better option for the Panthers right now, rather than a sack specialist. We had a pure pass rusher with Burns. Teams just ran the ball at him and took him out of games. A DT that can consistently get in the backfield and disrupt plays rather than a run stuffing NT is probably a better option for the Panthers right now too - Mason Graham. That addresses both the pass and run. Neither of these players would have great numbers, but they'd improve the defense and force offenses to scheme rather than just impose their will. That's when we'll see what Evero is really about. A later round speed WR that forces defenses to keep a safety over the top would really open up the offense - a Ted Ginn Jr type. Maybe a true pass receiving RB that can make guys miss in the open field. These guys aren't usually conventional early round draft picks but they'll improve the team in mission areas rather than focus areas. 
×
×
  • Create New...