Peter King list Carolina among teams that may be interested in Cutler

[panthers55]

This is true, there are QBs who have better production. However, Schaub, Rodgers, and Edwards didn't have stretches during the season where their production was tops in the NFL. Also, his defense was terrible. When you have the burden of having to lead your team to every win and get no help from your defense at all, you will create alot of turnovers. That's why he has such a high number of pass attempts and he still didn't have a bad completion percentage.

No he won't. He'll be an elite QB in the right situation, with a defense that can stop other teams and not put everything on him.

The defense was bad for sure but that is an apologist view. Look at San Diego. They were 25th in total defense while Denver was 29th. The difference was 20 yards which is less than one decent drive a game. And San Diego had the 20th rushing offense while Denver had the twelth.

Denver threw the ball 600 times and San Diego threw it almost 500 times. Explain how Rivers with the same crummy type of defense and a poorer running game blew Cutler away. He had a passer rating over 100 and an average yards per attempt of 8.4 yards. Cutler had a passer rating in the 80s and a YPA of 7.4. Rivers threw 34 TDs and 11 Ints while Cutler has 25 TDs and 18 Tds. The only reason that Rivers threw it less was because he was a lot more efficient and got just as many yards on less pass attempts.

Big difference was that Rivers willed him team to win when it counted and they responded. Cutler on the other hand caved and had some of his worst performances when the season was on the line.

Cutler elite??? Hardly.

Next excuse??????

[panthers55]

In games where the Broncos have allowed 21 points or fewer, Cutler is an impressive 13-1, and that only loss was to Green Bay in 2007 when the Packers won the coin toss and Brett Favre threw an 82-yard touchdown pass on the first play of overtime.

That means very little since Denver rarely does that. Plus it is a very selective stat that looks good but means nothing. Guess what his record would have been if they had kept everyone to 21 points this year? 8-7-1

In other words Denver scored less than 21 points 7 times, they scored 21 points once and scored over 21 points 8 times.

Not so hot huh??

[panthers55]

lmao at 55 trying to convince us (and himself) that Cutler would not be better for the Panthers than Jake would be.

There you go fishing again. We aren't talking about Jake we are talking about Cutler and how average he is. This thread is doing fine, go fish in one of the other ones that is slowing down.

[carpanfan96]

In games where the Broncos have allowed 21 points or fewer, Cutler is an impressive 13-1, and that only loss was to Green Bay in 2007 when the Packers won the coin toss and Brett Favre threw an 82-yard touchdown pass on the first play of overtime.

I can play that game too.

Jake Delhomme's overall record is 54 - 33.

In games where our defense holds the other team to 21 or fewer points, His record is 43 -12 in those games including playoff games.

[Fox007]

Wait who's trying to say Cutler is better than Rivers?

The pecking order in this discussion is real easy.

Rivers>Culter>Jake

[Nu Guns]

Panthers55: For as bad as you think he is....so you could really care less if he goes to Tampa?

[panthers55]

Wait who's trying to say Cutler is better than Rivers?

The pecking order in this discussion is real easy.

Rivers>Culter>Jake

No Cutler would be well down that list behind Trent Edwards, Chad Pennington and a host of other guys. Problem is he isn't worth half what folks think he is.

And keep up with the thread, someone else described Cutler as not Brady or Manning but at the next group with Rivers and McNabb. I conceded he was probably better than McNabb this year but pointed out he wasn't close to Rivers.

You are welcome for the recap.

[panthers55]

Panthers55: For as bad as you think he is....so you could really care less if he goes to Tampa?

From what I saw when we played him last year, I would be more afraid of Garcia than Cutler. BTW whose stats were better??? yeah, Garcia. The only thing holding him back is that Garcia is the oldest guy out there.

[Ccat]

In games where the Broncos have allowed 21 points or fewer, Cutler is an impressive 13-1, and that only loss was to Green Bay in 2007 when the Packers won the coin toss and Brett Favre threw an 82-yard touchdown pass on the first play of overtime.

So he's good at winning games when he doesn't need to score a lot? Ok, cool...

[Fox007]

Garcia always killed us.

[psyburn21]

The defense was bad for sure but that is an apologist view. Look at San Diego. They were 25th in total defense while Denver was 29th. The difference was 20 yards which is less than one decent drive a game. And San Diego had the 20th rushing offense while Denver had the twelth.

Denver threw the ball 600 times and San Diego threw it almost 500 times. Explain how Rivers with the same crummy type of defense and a poorer running game blew Cutler away. He had a passer rating over 100 and an average yards per attempt of 8.4 yards. Cutler had a passer rating in the 80s and a YPA of 7.4. Rivers threw 34 TDs and 11 Ints while Cutler has 25 TDs and 18 Tds. The only reason that Rivers threw it less was because he was a lot more efficient and got just as many yards on less pass attempts.

Big difference was that Rivers willed him team to win when it counted and they responded. Cutler on the other hand caved and had some of his worst performances when the season was on the line.

Cutler elite??? Hardly.

Next excuse??????

Wait who's trying to say Cutler is better than Rivers?

The pecking order in this discussion is real easy.

Rivers>Culter>Jake

I personally never said that Cutler was better then Rivers. Rivers is the better QB right now. My opinion is that Cutler is a top 10 QB and has alot more potential as a QB than Rivers or any QB you've mentioned except for Peyton Manning & Tom Brady, given he gets a better supporting cast (ie, defense) and good coaching.

[panthers55]

I personally never said that Cutler was better then Rivers. Rivers is the better QB right now. My opinion is that Cutler is a top 10 QB and has alot more potential as a QB than Rivers or any QB you've mentioned except for Peyton Manning & Tom Brady, given he gets a better supporting cast (ie, defense) and good coaching.

You can say top 10 or top 5 whatever. Give me some numbers to prove it. Otherwise as my sig says, you are what the numbers say you are, plain and simple.

If Cutler is top 10 based on numbers in the mid teens then so are lots of guys including you know who.

[carolinarolls]

There you go fishing again. We aren't talking about Jake we are talking about Cutler and how average he is. This thread is doing fine, go fish in one of the other ones that is slowing down.

:mad2:

but that is the point. Don't deny it. you are pulling bullshit from all over the league, its record books , its pundits and your own wild sense of reality to defame Cutler.

Why?

because you are in love with Jake Delhomme and you cannot stand to even consider someone else playing QB in Charlotte.

You are ridiculous. Don't say this is not about Jake because any discussion involving Carolina being interested in another QB involves Jake. Surely you are not that ******* dense.

You are in defense mode and you are manipulating everything you can to make anyone stacked up against Jake look bad. You are pathetic.

All anyone who disagrees with you has to say is "look at Jay Cutler" While you go on for pages and pages defaming him and praising Jake.

I bet people lol at the site of you 55. If not the damn sure do when you open your mouth.

[carolinarolls]

If Cutler is top 10 based on numbers in the mid teens then so are lots of guys including you know who.

Oh....sorry..this thread isn't about Jake Delhomme it's about "you know who"

lmao at 55