Obligatory "Do We Sign This Released Player?" Thread: Albert Haynesworth

[YoungPanthers89]

i mean... he's STILL better than half our dudes on the DL... bring him in for super cheap in camp maybe, cut him if he doesn't want to play.

He has proved 3 times over he doesnt want to play, he got cut by the bucs for fug sake!

[UNCrules2187]

He has proved 3 times over he doesnt want to play, he got cut by the bucs for fug sake!

I give him a pass for the Bucs...I mean, who wants to play for the Bucs?

But yeah, when he loafed/ate his way out of NE, that's when you knew his time in the league was over.

[Catweisers]

He used Washington for payday did nothing used Pats did nothing used Jags did nothing

looks like a pattern to me

[jtnc]

Proof, that Huddle posters are pretty fuging dumb. Bringz hims inz!!!!! Hurneys would bes teh retards toez not!!

[Wither]

Absolutely not.

[Ivan The Awesome]

Proof, that Huddle posters are pretty fuging dumb. Bringz hims inz!!!!! Hurneys would bes teh retards toez not!!

You wanted to cut Gamble a year ago...I wouldn't be so hard on others opinions if I were you. ;D

[Udogg]

You wanted to cut Gamble a year ago...I wouldn't be so hard on others opinions if I were you. ;D

Burn.... I think so.

[Snake]

I have no problem having him come to camp to compete. Still he prob would get cut because it seems he has no passion for the game anymore and was very ineffective everywhere he went.

[Guest Bwood15]

You wanted to cut Gamble a year ago...I wouldn't be so hard on others opinions if I were you. ;D

Lol ouch...dude just lost all credibility.

[Proudiddy]

Proof, that Huddle posters are pretty fuging dumb. Bringz hims inz!!!!! Hurneys would bes teh retards toez not!!

What's pretty f*cking dumb is wanting to cut one of the best shutdown corners in the game for no reason. Wanting to sign a guy who once was a dominant force on a low-risk trial basis at a position of need seems sensible.

We didn't. Who cares? His career is over. Who cares? It doesn't affect us.

[jtnc]

What's pretty f*cking dumb is wanting to cut one of the best shutdown corners in the game for no reason. Wanting to sign a guy who once was a dominant force on a low-risk trial basis at a position of need seems sensible.

We didn't. Who cares? His career is over. Who cares? It doesn't affect us.

At low risk? Seriously that fat fuging lard had a cap of 7.2 million dollars, and he's locker-room cancer, guess what? After the Pats cut him they went on to a 8 game winning streak. I never said I wanted to cut Gamble I said restructure his contract, you have no fuging proof I said that, but I do see your uniformed, ill-advised comments in this thread about bringing in a fuging bum. :jc:

[jtnc]

You wanted to cut Gamble a year ago...I wouldn't be so hard on others opinions if I were you. ;D

Provide proof. Please do, please find ONE single comment where I said I wanted him cut. Go find it. Cause you obviously do not know what the fug you're talking about.

Pleaaaseeeeee find my comment.

[jtnc]

Bringing in Haynesworth is no different than bringing in T.O. except T.O. actually produces.

[Proudiddy]

At low risk? Seriously that fat fuging lard had a cap of 7.2 million dollars, and he's locker-room cancer, guess what? After the Pats cut him they went on to a 8 game winning streak. I never said I wanted to cut Gamble I said restructure his contract, you have no fuging proof I said that, but I do see your uniformed, ill-advised comments in this thread about bringing in a fuging bum. :jc:

You seem a extra butthurt.

Whether you said to cut him or restructure, after the season he had, he isn't a candidate for either.

What was ill advised about suggesting we sign a guy that we have to pay very little. IIRC, his cap number wasn't that high once he was released... He could be had for cheap... Our DTs sucked until we stuck our 4th and 5th string guys in there... How is that dumb compared to slighting one of our best players?

I stated pretty clearly in this thread that I thought it was worth a shot considering the circumstances we were in - low risk, potentially high reward. Would've been worth a shot, but we didn't do it... So who cares? If he's low risk then I can completely understand not signing him... It wasn't any sweat off my back... But it was significant enough for you to come into this thread and trash people that thought it was worth a try?

Cool.

Now get back to feverishly searching all your Gamble posts and editing them before people find them... I'm not searching.