Obligatory "Do We Sign This Released Player?" Thread: Albert Haynesworth

[Snake]

No, they are not the same type of player. No matter how many times you repeat it, its simply not true.

Your the only one that thinks that because you refuse to understand reality. :rolleyes:

[Panthor]

I agree with Dpantherman

[Yaboychris28]

Lets sign him. If he sucks, cut his fat a$$

[Snake]

He will pass threw waivers today and tomorrow will be able to sign him for a vet min. If he even wants to come here.

[rodeo]

Nah our only chance is through waivers, he'll be snatched up and produce for another team if he passes through them.

[Cold Cat]

I don't see any reason for not giving him a shot. Sign him. Hopefully it all works out and we'll have help in a position of need for years to come. Give him a incentive based contract (again if things work out) to keep him motivated.

If he becomes a cancer cut him. Nothing vested in him now. Its not like we are trading away anything to get a solid starter.

[Dpantherman]

Your the only one that thinks that because you refuse to understand reality. :rolleyes:

Yes, I am the only one to think that. And reality is your opinion. Got it. Next.

[Swarly]

I don't think some of you guys realize the laziness that comes with Fat Albert.

[csx]

No, they are not the same type of player. No matter how many times you repeat it, its simply not true.

They aren't even remotely similar people or players.

[csx]

Your the only one that thinks that because you refuse to understand reality. :rolleyes:

They aren't even remotely similar players or people. I think you are alone on this one.

[SevenSixes]

Ok, let's look at what we are really talking about.

Some want us to cut a spot to potentially bring in a 30 year old DT who hasn't really performed up to expectations at 3 teams. We will have to spend extra time in practice to get him to learn the playbook and calls for his position while we continue to try to develop 2 rookies who currently look confused and lack the gas to finish.

So, can we get this guy to perform with a short time to learn the system?

Is he a "stop gap" or is he "the answer"?

If he's a stop gap player we would have at the most 4-6 games that he will be effective in *if he gives the effort*. Couldn't we still win those games without him?

Shouldn't we opt to spend the practice reps and coaching time on the two guys that we've been investing in for the past 4 months? Most likely we will have to decide between Fua and McClain this off season as to who will remain. Why shouldn't we take the next 8 games to fully evaluate these two, instead of trying to teach a lazy old vet how we do stuff around here..

[Dpantherman]

I hope no one picks him up honestly so he actually sees what he's missing. I hope he has to sit out the rest of the season, get his poo together, and come ready to play in 2012.

[Dpantherman]

Well, now hes a Buccaneer.

[Jbro]

They didn't let him clear waivers? Weird