Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Terry Bradshaw ranked Dalton ahead of Cam...


MGH1989

Recommended Posts

Not sure what they are but they are better than Cam's.

He plays in a much more conservative offense so his numbers aren't going to be as eye popping as Cam's. They were much more focused on making the playoffs as opposed to having a QB win ROTY.

Wrong actually, Cam's stats hold up to Dalton's. If it weren't for Nannee he'd probably have a better comp percentage. Their passing TD:INT ratio is very similar, no reason to consider rushing because we know Cam has that one.

However, Cincy has a top 10 D, Dalton doesn't have to be as good as, or better than Cam to win games.

TB has no argument based on numbers- you really think TB has a bust in Canton without the infamous Steel Curtain D? Maybe, but it's a lot less likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey let's be Pantherball and check in on Andy Dalton's drives in the 2nd half yesterday since he's obviously such a more clutch performer than Cam Newton.

1) 3 and out

2) INT at the Seattle 39 yard line

3) INT at midfield

4) After starting at his own 38 (hello special teams), the running game picks up 18 yards, he completes a 4 yard pass and two defensive penalties lead to his kicker making a 48 yard FG

5) 3 kneel downs

4 of 11 passing for 34 yards, 2 INTs, in the 2nd half what a winner. Oh by the way, the Bengals got a punt return for a TD, and then an INT for a touchdown in the 4th quarter.

Shh. These people don't actually what cincy games. They just throw out multiple platitiudes about being a winner or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong actually, Cam's stats hold up to Dalton's. If it weren't for Nannee he'd probably have a better comp percentage. Their passing TD:INT ratio is very similar, no reason to consider rushing because we know Cam has that one.

However, Cincy has a top 10 D, Dalton doesn't have to be as good as, or better than Cam to win games.

TB has no argument based on numbers- you really think TB has a bust in Canton without the infamous Steel Curtain D? Maybe, but it's a lot less likely.

You can't compare stats because they are asked to do different things is my point.

You can play the "what if" game all you want, I'm sure Arizona did when they signed Derek Anderson, but all that we know is Dalton and the Bengals are 5-2, Cam and the Panthers are 2-6 but he throws for a lot of yards and stuff.

They are both impressive, along with Ponder, but comparing all of them is ridiculous considering each individual circumstance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that our defense is 5th worst in points allowed right? QB's will make mistakes it's the defenses job to limit the damage that is done when that happens. Our problem is not the offense or Cam it is the D. Plain and simple.

The offenses job is also to score more than the defense gives up. Just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, put more of a burden on Cam's shoulders to carry this offense. Hey, might as well ask him to run for about 100 yards a game too.

Yes because Cam has to do it alone. He doesn't have help from Smith, Shockey, Olsen, Stewart, no one. He alone shoulders the whole offense.

The offense is just as responsible for a lost as the defense. The offense job is to score when they have the ball. The defense job is to stop the opposition from scoring. When one part fails to do their job, the other part is supposed to step up. That is how teams win games in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Man whether it's the Panthers or the Hornets it's crazy how many foolish talking heads there are in the local media. I just unsubscribed from locked on Hornets. Doug Branson with his cheesy mustache is an absolute clown especially when his partner isn't on. Talking about trading LaMelo because he can't win basketball games by himself with no semblance whatsoever of a legitimate Center. These YouTube personalities will say anything for a damn click.
    • I’m hoping for that exact same scenario, two seconds would be big for us. I’d hope for 3 impact players. A WR/DL/DE that can contribute like this current class would be key to our rebuild.
    • When I look at what I can find, a carryover problem from last season is our receivers are still unable to get enough separation on a consistent basis. Canales is certainly better at scheming them open, like how he sneaked out Thielen for a big play. But then he's also having Thielen running routes he frankly shouldn't be doing anymore. I feel part of the RZ issues is not really having anyone - after trading Diontae - who can make those quick cuts on a short field to give whoever is under center a wider window to throw. We also only have one guy with blazing speed in Thompkins and from what I could see, he's really used more to draw away coverage. I bring this all up because what Canales needs for sustained success - other than QB - is the other receiver pieces we'll be getting in the offseason.  Otherwise, I have to say that Canales isn't as afraid to be aggressive offensively. As others mentioned, still doesn't run the ball enough at times. Finally, I still feel his playcalls still doesn't line up with his mantra of getting rid of the ball within x amount of seconds. Maybe I count too slow. Oh, and I'm glad Canales first game after a bye looked good. I feared he'd be like Ron Rivera where we would fall flat on our faces.
×
×
  • Create New...