Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton Changing the way the quarterback position is played.


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if this has been posted. Didn't see I link. I believe this is the espn 32 video that's been missing.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/26703/nfl32-what-did-learn-about-young-qbs

A few of us were discussing the posibility of cam changing the way the game was played even before he was drafted. Many of the talking heads around the huddle said this wasn't possible. after seeing what we've seen so far what say you???

SN: I don't know how to embed the video so if someone who does can do that it would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh :nonod:

There's always some writer or analyst who throws out the whole tired "changing the game" line, and they're just about always referencing a black quarterback.

News Flash: I'm pretty sure the game has seen quarterbacks who can both run and pass before. And they haven't all been white either.

I'd add that for the "game to be changed" as the theory goes, you'd need about a dozen more quarterbacks on the horizon that have Newton's combination of size, running and passing ability. How many can you name that fit that description?

Newton is a great quarterback, but he's not "changing the game". He's playing the game at a very high level, same as guys like Brett Favre, John Elway, Steve McNair and others did before him.

That's enough for me. I don't need the "game to be changed". I just need the guy who plays quarterback for us to be good at the game as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont know about all that but i guarantee you the saints, falcons, and bucs are going to change their drafting strategies based on trying to stop cam newton. he has changed our division for years to come.

That I'll give you.

And that means way more to me than supposedly "changing the game".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Vick was supposed to change the way QBs played the game.

Cam takes dumps that are tougher than Vick.

What Vick was supposed to do was usher in an era of running quarterbacks.

He didn't, and neither will Newton, but for different reasons.

Vick didn't change the game because he wasn't a good enough passer to be considered a true dual threat. Newton won't change it because, like the others mentioned above, he's a passer first. The running ability is just an added weapon, same as it is for guys like Aaron Rodgers.

I'm not even sure why people compare Newton to Vick. They really don't have that much in common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has never been a QB with his COMBINED skill set speed and power, big arm and he has been accurate. Swag Newton is special.

Like he said in the interview pre draft with Primetime he's a little bit of Vick, a little bit of Big Ben/Brady etc. Which makes his potential off the charts along with his work ethic to want to be one of the great's at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dilfer's not saying that teams will be looking for Newton-lites in the draft (although I'm sure some will take gambles in hopes they can find someone even remotely like him) but that Cam is demonstrating that supremely athletic quarterbacks actually can thrive as pocket passers if they have the drive and mental makeup that desires to do so.

And frankly, there have been athletic QBs even in recent years that showed those abilities, but it wasn't often that the most physically gifted player on the team was the quarterback.

He thinks Cam will help remove the stigma regarding the physicality of a player meaning that the player would not be mentally tough or astute enough to excel at the position. The game-changing aspect may be that future players see that Cam can be both a physical force and thrive in the traditional role of a quarterback, and desire to be quarterbacks rather than receivers or tight ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its a valid arguement that dilfer is making. He could change the way people view how quarterback is played. Simply by allowing the young kids a early age who are the biggest strongest athletes on a team to become the quarterback. If that happens i think you might see more cam type players enter the college ranks, there for leading to potentially more in the NFL.

I know alot of you don't see it as possible I think it's already happening. The early success and affect of cam newton on the NFL could be felt as early as next year. With all the talk of Luck,jones, and barkley i exspect a Cam like talent RG3(robbert griffin III) to also rise up draft boards. He doesn't have much experince but,newton is proving that might not be as big of a factor as it use to be.

Don't be suprised if Griffin slides ahead of one of the big three just because of Newton. Accept the "Newton effect".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has never been a QB with his COMBINED skill set speed and power, big arm and he has been accurate. Swag Newton is special.

Like he said in the interview pre draft with Primetime he's a little bit of Vick, a little bit of Big Ben/Brady etc. Which makes his potential off the charts along with his work ethic to want to be one of the great's at QB.

yes there has

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dilfer's not saying that teams will be looking for Newton-lites in the draft (although I'm sure some will take gambles in hopes they can find someone even remotely like him) but that Cam is demonstrating that supremely athletic quarterbacks actually can thrive as pocket passers if they have the drive and mental makeup that desires to do so.

And frankly, there have been athletic QBs even in recent years that showed those abilities, but it wasn't often that the most physically gifted player on the team was the quarterback.

He thinks Cam will help remove the stigma regarding the physicality of a player meaning that the player would not be mentally tough or astute enough to excel at the position. The game-changing aspect may be that future players see that Cam can be both a physical force and thrive in the traditional role of a quarterback, and desire to be quarterbacks rather than receivers or tight ends.

Good points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...