Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

According to ESPN Torry Holt would be a good pick-up for us....


Recommended Posts

Holt is a class guy and is excellent, but he would be too much and wouldn't be used. It's time to get Jarrett some touches. I'd even be as bold as saying let's let him play as the #2 WR. He's the future. He's caught everything through to him over the last season. If we don't soon let him play we're probably going to lose him. Much like how we are finally letting Marshall play as a starter, if we didn't he'd probably be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We sign holt with robinson being our return specialist, that means jarrett gets deactivated for every game AGAIN

as good as holt is, signing expensive old dudes to take away playing time from the cheap, talented, young ones isn't going to get us very far

unless we get a completley new return specialst who plays defensive back I wouldn't want to get another WR right now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holt is a class guy and is excellent, but he would be too much and wouldn't be used. It's time to get Jarrett some touches. I'd even be as bold as saying let's let him play as the #2 WR. He's the future. He's caught everything through to him over the last season. If we don't soon let him play we're probably going to lose him. Much like how we are finally letting Marshall play as a starter, if we didn't he'd probably be gone.

Actually he caught 52% of the passes thrown his way, dropped 1, and 47% went for first downs. Compare that to Moose who caught 60.2% of those thrown his way, dropped 8 and 42.6 went for first downs.

http://hosted.stats.com/fb/playerstats.asp?id=8299&team=29

http://hosted.stats.com/fb/playerstats.asp?id=3511&team=29

Committee for truth in posting.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I remind you that getting other receivers is pointless because Jake will not throw the ball to them anyway. Waste of time, waste of money.
so thats why moose had

REC 65, YDS 923, AVG 14.2, TDS 5.........just saying, get some facts straight before you blindly bash jake!!!! there is also a reason they call smith a primary reciever!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32% of Jake's passes went to Steve Smith. Thats not an excessive number. Our other receivers didn't get a lot of catches because we didn't throw the ball that much.

Good point. As you say, almost 70% of Jake's passes went to someone other than Steve Smith. If they want better numbers they can catch the ball and extend more drives which gets them more catches and increases Jake's confidence in them. I don't remember Ricky Proehl having a problem getting balls from Jake as a third receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...