Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

And you think your job sux?


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

Longer life expectancy than mine... I just took a position where I see how many exstacy pills I can take without having a sezuire. My company says testing on animals is wrong.

I wanna get promoted to cough syrup tester one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Longer life expectancy than mine... I just took a position where I see how many exstacy pills I can take without having a sezuire. My company says testing on animals is wrong.

I wanna get promoted to cough syrup tester one day.

Testing on animals if wrong! Have you ever tried putting makeup and lipstick on an animal? It's not easy! Blush and Eyeliner are the worst! Animals won't sit there for an hour while someone makes them up like a woman will!

Paint their nails and bows in the hair, yes. But animals draw the line at the rest of makeup!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

supposedly one of the most dangerous jobs in history really was being a monarch, lol.

but uh, in the us in 1800... hmm, probably would have thought logging or something related to it if it wasn't miner or some kind of factory worker

though in school I remember being told irish immigrants would often have to take the most dangerous jobs... mining, building the rail road, canals. don't recall what others there were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Testing on animals if wrong! Have you ever tried putting makeup and lipstick on an animal? It's not easy! Blush and Eyeliner are the worst! Animals won't sit there for an hour while someone makes them up like a woman will!

Paint their nails and bows in the hair, yes. But animals draw the line at the rest of makeup!

Salty has goats down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh btw.... Was that pussy job a king? Mine is funner.

This job you got to carry a gun! And, they only wanted boys from 14-16 years old and were preferably orphans!

If you have a son 14-16 or your daughter has dated a boy 14-16 years old, you know they have no fear. While else would they try half pipes on a skateboard with no helmet or pads? Gnarly Dude!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even soldier! The civil war (Excuse me! War of Northern Agression!)hadn't started yet.

Job only lasted 19 months and was replaced with Automation!

The Job?

Pony Express Rider!

Cut mail time from St Louis to San Francisco from 20 days to 10!, but cost $2.00! (1860's money) to mail a letter!

In 1875, a Colt Peacemaker only cost $8.00!

The job was replaced with the telegraph!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These last couple playoff/championship games for the edge class will mean millions. Someone will have a big game and become the favorite top edge. Everything is on the line for the edge group now.  
    • Because he's not the best prospect in the draft, he's the best college player in the draft, and those are two entirely different things. Yes, if he focused on one side, his stats may have been better, but stats aren't what makes a player's prospects, it's their abilities and how they translate to the next level. I'm also not knocking him as a prospect, not like I'm saying he's a mid round pick, he's just probably the 2nd best CB and 3rd best WR, in what way is that throwing shade on him?  It's literally saying he's a Top 10 pick, just not THE top prospect at his position(s).  I really don't get why you think someone saying a player is the 2nd best player at one position and 2nd or 3rd best at another position is hating on them, it's crazy talk. Even in your defense of him here, you say a just asinine sentence, "he's the #1 rated prospect because he's actually elite at both positions" His ability at 2 positions has 0% bearing on his NFL prospects, as no team is going to use him full time both ways, he's either going to be a full time WR, or a mostly full time CB who gets 5 or so snaps a game on offense.   So him playing both positions shouldn't factor into any team's draft evaluation of him, if a team is taking him over Johnson because of the few snaps he'd play on offense, they're choosing a player for the wrong reason.  The only way I'm taking him over T-Mac is if it's a team that already has a true outside #1 and what they need is speed in the slot to compliment the outside guy (and btw, most teams don't have that, if anything, most would have the slot guy and need the true outside #1).
    • Remember when @CamWhoaaCam didn't bandwagon that team that was having a surprisingly good season?  
×
×
  • Create New...