Hypothetical: Would You Take This Trade? (Worst Thread of The Month) Gif Approved

[1989]

Matthew Stafford and Ndamukong Suh for Cam Newton.

I dont think I would. Newton has far more upside and stability than Stafford. Suh is unbelievable but I think Suh's are easier to find than Newtons....

[Vampire the buffet slayer]

No. I think Lions are just a flash in the pan. Just cant buy the Lions being good.

[Panthro]

wat

[CRA]

No. Cam has a higher ceiling than Stafford.....and you can't trade a QB with Cam's potential ceiling.

[TylerVagyler]

Nah, Lions are going to be good for awhile. But Cam > Stafford in the long run. We can find a DT elsewhere.

[Herbert The Love Bug]

throw in Calvin Johnson and we may talk. Stafford has to have Johnson to be good.

But no way in crap heck I'd take the trade either way. it would be crazy.

[g5jamz]

Johnson and Suh for Cam...yes.

Tank the rest of the year for Luck.

/runs out of thread before match is lit

[Herbert The Love Bug]

Plus just looking at Stafford annoys me. He looks like an ugly girl. he annoys me. But I could look at Cam all day long. He is a hunk and has a nice smile

[brandon_87]

Matthew Stafford and Ndamukong Suh for Cam Newton.

I dont think I would. Newton has far more upside and stability than Stafford. Suh is unbelievable but I think Suh's are easier to find than Newtons....

No, however, I would trade all of our troll ass posters for a full tank of gas

[Vampire the buffet slayer]

Johnson and Suh for Cam...yes.

Tank the rest of the year for Luck.

/runs out of thread before match is lit

Even if we tanked the rest of the season we'd have 1 win, and thats one more than the colts will have this year.

[brandon_87]

Johnson and Suh for Cam...yes.

Tank the rest of the year for Luck.

/runs out of thread before match is lit

Like this guy...

Who the fug still mentions Luck?

[panthers55]

I wouldn't take the trade but for a different reason than most. When you trade you take on the salaries of the players involved. Addup Stafford and Suh's contracts and compare that to Newton's. then tell me whether we want to trade a very cheap contract for two huge ones setting aside the players and their potential.

Suh got a 68 million contract with 40 million guaranteed in 2010. Stafford got a 6 year 72 million contract in 2009.

Compare that to Newton's 4 year 22 million contract.

Yeah...........

[Vampire the buffet slayer]

Like this guy...

Who the fug still mentions Luck?

I can think of a few........

[1989]

I wouldn't take the trade but for a different reason than most. When you trade you take on the salaries of the players involved. Addup Stafford and Suh's contracts and compare that to Newton's. then tell me whether we want to trade a very cheap contract for two huge ones setting aside the players and their potential.

Suh got a 68 million contract with 40 million guaranteed in 2010. Stafford got a 6 year 72 million contract in 2009.

Compare that to Newton's 4 year 22 million contract.

Yeah...........

Good thought.

Cam is better than Stafford and DT's arent necessarily going to WIN you games.