Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Reason Drew Brees had so much Success


Matthias

Recommended Posts

There was no bump and run coverage with our secondary. The saints receivers had free release all day, and Brees was in perfect rhythm. If the guys just got in the receivers face just once today, Brees would have had to adjust, giving more time for CJ or Hardy to get to him.

I am utterly disgusted Rivera didn't make that adjustment all game, especially on that last drive.:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Setfree1012

They spoke about this DURING the game, they didn't go man because of the match-up issues they'd face with Graham and Sproles 1v1. Zones were the best option given the match-ups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still, we should have at least knock these receivers timing off a little bit. No way will we beat an elite QB with a zone scheme. (The most we could hope for is him overthrowing a guy and picking it off, like we did with Sherrod) I think we could have handled Sproiles with our fastest linebacker on him etc. We could have made it work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still, we should have at least knock these receivers timing off a little bit. No way will we beat an elite QB with a zone scheme. (The most we could hope for is him overthrowing a guy and picking it off, like we did with Sherrod) I think we could have handled Sproiles with our fastest linebacker on him etc. We could have made it work.

Good luck. Sproles is what Reggie Bush wishes he was.

LB's don't match up, he's too quick, and understands that passing game too well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good luck. Sproles is what Reggie Bush wishes he was.

LB's don't match up, he's too quick, and understands that passing game too well.

Sproles wasn't nearly as effective as I was afraid he would be. We need guys that can wrap up constantly with this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sproles wasn't nearly as effective as I was afraid he would be. We need guys that can wrap up constantly with this guy.

He was absolutely effective. We had to have certain personnel on the field when he was in there, limiting us in other areas.

It's like that with any playmaker. You can take most any of them away, but at what expense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Setfree1012

The DB's fyi were re-routing the receivers in the passing game, take a look at the stats http://www.panthers.com/schedule/game/2011/regular5/ we bottled the receivers up really well conisdering how explosive they are.

To me a lot of the cover issues were against the TE obviously, at 6'6" and being a former basketball player he was a matchu-up nightmare for the S's, and LB's (Godfrey did well, outside of that crazy catch on the deflection). But with two good coverage LB's in Beason and Davis on IR I see how that became IMO one of the determining factors in the loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

zone was only option as mentioned by others. Our backfield and pass rush will get better.

Our zone coverage will get better too. Lots of guys in no man's land yesterday looking a bit confused.

his success was because he was not on his back. if he's not on his back he is gonna make a good play. It's not because he is a genius, he just has the reps and the time back there to trust the experience he gained from those reps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could have still bumped in zone coverage if our corners were patrolling the flats. Just get off the man once somebody comes in the flats. However, everybody in this thread is right, you mainly play bump-and-run in man coverage, and we don't have personnel to do so against the Saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

zone was only option as mentioned by others. Our backfield and pass rush will get better.

Our zone coverage will get better too. Lots of guys in no man's land yesterday looking a bit confused.

his success was because he was not on his back. if he's not on his back he is gonna make a good play. It's not because he is a genius, he just has the reps and the time back there to trust the experience he gained from those reps.

Look at when we did get pressure on Brees. A couple sacks and a couple bad throws. You get to him and he gets panicky. He is so used to being able to sit back all day that he freaks out if he has no escape valve readily available.

Our guy, on the other hand, throws 60 yard bombs in the face of pressure. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think is overstating things on our O that should be said if we are going to position the convo as a make it or break it thing for Bryce.  I consider this year 2 for him and you often see regression year 2.  AT is not in reality a top 10 slot WR.   We force feed a vet WR in the slot that can catch.  Which generates statistics for AT.  He is more savvy rec TE at this stage than anything.  We just drafted TMac.  You can't really count him as anything except for a promising young WR that is about to have a rookie season.  XL is on the development train. 2 promising young WRs that both are going to have to grow into legit NFL WRs.  TEs are presently a below average group.  RBs are in reality are probably a pretty average group in reality.  Where we currently stand out IMO is our OL talent.  
    • Overall I'm happy. We've never drafted a receiver this high and that's probably a big part of the reason why we've only had one elite tier level WR in franchise history. Scourton looked like top 10 pick material playing at a lighter weight then bulking up hurt his sack number while he overall still played well. We're going to play him at the lighter weight. Princely is a guy a lot of folks were hot or cold on. Hopefully the hot folks were right. But he has NFL measurables, had double digit sacks last year, and most importantly to me he showed steady progression as a player throughout his college career. The arrow is pointing up. Etienne surprised me. I wasn't expecting us to go RB this early but I think he's a solid compliment to Chuba and most of us expected us to draft a RB at some point in the mid to late rounds so it's not shocking. I don't love the Ransom pick simply because he's not the type of safety I wanted us to draft. I wanted us to draft a deep coverage specialist. But, that's the type of safety the Panthers have never seemed to value and it doesn't seem like anything has changed there. It is what it is. I didn't expect us to wait this long to add a DT in this strong DT draft but Cam Jackson was a guy we showed a lot of interest in throughout the pre-draft process so this clearly wasn't a panic move with DTs flying off the board. This is a guy we liked all along. Mitchell Evans is a well rounded TE that probably projects as an NFL backup which is fine at this point in the draft. Like Etienne, he's another guy with an elite 10 yard split time. What he lacks in downfield ability he makes up for in initial suddenness. That can end up being a lot more important on a football field than deep speed. Horn seems like a guy added at least as much for his return ability as his receiving ability. I like that for a late round pick. It gives a guy multiple paths to making the roster.
×
×
  • Create New...