Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What to do what to do


Floppin

Recommended Posts

this is even a question? go hang with your friends, have a night out on the town.. does that turn illegal when you get married?

what the poo kind of marriages are you all signing up for....

seriously, WTF...

I dont think it is a matter of being illegal per say..it's the fact that now he is only responsible for himself. He doesn't have to cook dinner for the kids..help with homework..that sort of thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think it is a matter of being illegal per say..it's the fact that now he is only responsible for himself. He doesn't have to cook dinner for the kids..help with homework..that sort of thing

I get it. there was a little resentment coming out on some past friends (with no kids) who seem to have absolutely no problem conjoining themselves to the hip of a random ass person and disregarding every friendship they ever had due to a disease called codependency..

just doesn't quick click for me.. although I do understand where floppin is comin from, I guess kids helps push out the rest of your life since they are the prime focus..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...