Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Overtime Rules


What should be the Overtime format in the NFL?  

88 members have voted

  1. 1. What should be the Overtime format in the NFL?

    • Keep it the same: Sudden Death
      29
    • Keep Sudden Death but twick the system
      19
    • Go to the college format
      29
    • Something completely different
      11


Recommended Posts

I actually like the idea I heard from Peter King I believe it was... He said they ought to adapt the college style system, but with one huge tweak... Give each team one possession, so fans feel like their team at least had a fair shot. He said it should be kicked off and everything the same way as if you were just starting the game, so each team gets a chance.

He said this would be great for the game because the current format is unfair. He mentioned that so much of the game weighs on the coin flip at the end of regulation and was like "why else do the fans of the team that loses the coin flip boo and get upset when the other team wins it... because it gave them an advantage in trying to win the game."

If each team has a possession, no one can say they didn't get a fair chance. I'd love to see them adapt this system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like the idea I heard from Peter King I believe it was... He said they ought to adapt the college style system, but with one huge tweak... Give each team one possession, so fans feel like their team at least had a fair shot. He said it should be kicked off and everything the same way as if you were just starting the game, so each team gets a chance.

He said this would be great for the game because the current format is unfair. He mentioned that so much of the game weighs on the coin flip at the end of regulation and was like "why else do the fans of the team that loses the coin flip boo and get upset when the other team wins it... because it gave them an advantage in trying to win the game."

If each team has a possession, no one can say they didn't get a fair chance. I'd love to see them adapt this system.

My biggest problem with the "coin flip" arguement is that I would bet that the percentage of teams that win a game in regulation after winning the coin flip at the begining of a game is about the same as the winning percentage of teams that win the game in overtime after winning the overtime coin flip.

Over the entire history of the NFL 58% of teams win the game after winning the coin flip in overtime. Thats not that big of a percentage. And that also doesn't take into account that some of those wins both teams did get a chance on offense.

To be honest I can not think of a overtime game this season where a team won the coin flip, drove the ball within FG range and won. Granted I don't watch every game but I honestly can't ever remember watching an NFL game that went into overtime and this happened. I'm sure it has but I just don't remember it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give each team one possession, so fans feel like their team at least had a fair shot. He said it should be kicked off and everything the same way as if you were just starting the game, so each team gets a chance.

That makes a lot of sense... but what happens if the offense has a turnover? Do they then have to kickoff or does the other team start from that point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My biggest problem with the "coin flip" arguement is that I would bet that the percentage of teams that win a game in regulation after winning the coin flip at the begining of a game is about the same as the winning percentage of teams that win the game in overtime after winning the overtime coin flip.

Over the entire history of the NFL 58% of teams win the game after winning the coin flip in overtime. Thats not that big of a percentage. And that also doesn't take into account that some of those wins both teams did get a chance on offense.

To be honest I can not think of a overtime game this season where a team won the coin flip, drove the ball within FG range and won. Granted I don't watch every game but I honestly can't ever remember watching an NFL game that went into overtime and this happened. I'm sure it has but I just don't remember it.

This. People overestimate the importance of the coin flip. I hear people make the argument all the time that the coin flip decides overtime. Well, all you need to prove that theory wrong is the statistic that mountainpantherfan pointed out. It really ends up being pretty equal.

I don't like the college system much just because teams could end up having so many overtimes and scores that the statistics get boosted. Then you are gonna have the QB's that threw for 10 TD's in one game which is just ridiculous.

However, I wouldn't be against tweaking the current system a little bit if people felt it was needed, so I voted for that option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I just read something that I hadn't heard before. It's from WikiAnswers so I don't know if it's actually true but it sounds reasonable. Heres the link:

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_percent_of_teams_that_win_the_coin_toss_win_in_overtime_in_the_NFL

It basically says that since the rule change to kick off from the 30 yard line the team that wins the coin toss wins over 60% of the time. That is a little unfair, so still I would be in favor of tweaking the current rules a little bit to make it a little more fair, but I would still be angry if we switched to college overtime rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple years ago I was behind a switch to the college system but now I like the current system.

Football is a team sport, if you lose the coin flip then you have to rely on the on your defense to get the ball back. If you defense folds on the first drive then you deserve to lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • his height, size and arm will forever cause problems and limitations...that is what it is.  I think to a degree, the law of averages is just coming into play a bit with him.  So as he plays more and more, you just flat out get the decent days mixed in too.  Which is just going to happen. 
    • Good point. He's definitely better in 10-15 yards. I think that's his biggest improvement. But he wasn't 3-10 +15, he was 3-7, with at least one drop (minor but still). And with multiple passes at 14 yards completed. This passing chart doesn't look like at By one, lol. He threw more "deep" passes than Mahomes (NOT comparing him to Mahomes in a skill way lol), or at least more beyind 10 yards.
    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
×
×
  • Create New...