Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nationals WILL compete next year.

Swarly

By Swarly,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

Yes I'm aware they're in the NL East. This team is on the upswing and will shock some people next season.

They're going to add a SP this offseason and many are saying CJ Wilson. That means the starting rotation would look something like this

Strasburg

Wilson

Zimmermann

Wang

Lannan

The bullpen needs some work but they have a pretty elite 8th/9th inning combo in Clippard & Storen.

The offense could use some work but it's got a very solid foundation. Zimmerman and Morse are already stars. Danny Espinosa & Wilson Ramos have shown loads of potential throughout the season with the bat, but haven't been consistent. If Werth can revert back to his Philly ways next year, the offense could be something special. This isn't even factoring the possibility of Harper playing next year.

You also have to take into account the Nats have a farm system many say is among the best in the league(top 5 at worse).

Man, haven't been this excited about baseball in a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Veteran

Captroop

Posted
Posted

Ive been thinking that at the beginning of the season for a couple years now, and somehow they manage to continue to be mediocre

If you thought they would be anything better than a .500 team this year, you were foolish. I went in expecting that, and it's proven about right. I agree, that the Nats should be able to compete next year. But in the same division as Atlanta and the Phillies, I think the best we can hope for in the near future is giving the Braves an honest run for the Wildcard spot. We are doomed to be third fiddle for a while.

But next year, with a stonger rotation, a deadly 8th-9th combo, an honest to goodness first baseman, and emerging home run threats in Morse and Espinosa, the only thing keeping us from really succeeding is a true lead-off man who can get us an early jump on the scoreboard when Zim hits a liner into shallow right. Having two outs when he gets to the plate is costing us dozens of runs every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ive been thinking that at the beginning of the season for a couple years now, and somehow they manage to continue to be mediocre

The Nationals have never had the starting pitching they will have in 2012. This is without us signing a big name starter. I don't know why you would predict us to be above .500 any year before this one but our team has never been as talented as it will be next year.

Hell, we're probably going to end the season just a few games under .500 and we were without Zimmerman, one of the best players at his position in the league, for a big part of the season. We were without Strasburg until September, and he's still not at full strength. Zimmermann will be able to pitch an entire season. Our big time free agency signing put together an absolutely abysmal season(Werth)... Our manager quit in the middle of the fuging season right after getting us over .500 for the first time(that late into the season) in I don't know how long. There are so many things that went against us this year yet we still finished with a very respectable record given our division.

If you thought they would be anything better than a .500 team this year, you were foolish. I went in expecting that, and it's proven about right. I agree, that the Nats should be able to compete next year. But in the same division as Atlanta and the Phillies, I think the best we can hope for in the near future is giving the Braves an honest run for the Wildcard spot. We are doomed to be third fiddle for a while.

But next year, with a stonger rotation, a deadly 8th-9th combo, an honest to goodness first baseman, and emerging home run threats in Morse and Espinosa, the only thing keeping us from really succeeding is a true lead-off man who can get us an early jump on the scoreboard when Zim hits a liner into shallow right. Having two outs when he gets to the plate is costing us dozens of runs every year.

Yeah the lead off hitter thing has got to be solved. I know they've been interested in BJ Upton for quite a while but I don't think he would solve the problem. Really wish they would have made a move for Michael Bourn... the Braves got him for pennies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      [Joe Person] Jonathon Brooks had a successful 2nd ACL surgery - Expected to miss all of 2025 Season

      By TD alt · Posted

      He doesn't need to play in 2025. And maybe not 2026 either from what I've read. This is but one peer-reviewed selection:    "A devastating complication of returning to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a second ACL injury. Strong evidence now indicates that younger, more active athletes are at particularly high risk for a second ACL injury and this risk is greatest within the first two years following ACLR." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5226931/     Regarding your first question... "The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision that affects patient outcomes significantly. Even though there is no consensus in the literature, there are some trends regarding timing of ACLR. Various authors suggest that ACLR be performed at least 3 weeks after injury in order to avoid arthrofibrosis. More important than time alone, objective criteria including perioperative swelling, edema, hyperthermia, and ROM are important indicators of when surgery should be performed." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4004131/#:~:text=The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision,in order to avoid arthrofibrosis.  
    • Stingray3030
      [The Athletic] Panthers’ offseason to-do list

      By Stingray3030 · Posted

      Not sure I would be so sure they feel worse than us - their QB was better than Bryce at in the first season, they got DJ Moore, and 2 more high caliber draft picks.  We had to give up basically our entire defense this season indirectly to make that happen and we still have no true #1 WR.  Not saying I would rather have Caleb over Bryce at this point - but I would rather have their team situation and draft picks hands down.
    • MHS831
      Panthers free agents

      By MHS831 · Posted

      A lot of people think this draft is weak at QB--I think, after the first five picks of the first round, there are a ton of developmental QBs who could develop into the role--here is the psychology behind it--Bryce becomes the mentor--you can learn as much by teaching others than by being taught.   It also makes him a true leader.  But I think there are a few QB in this draft that might not be ready now, but in 2 years, could be NFL starting QBs--Howard, Rourke, Ewers, Milroe, Dart, etc.  Talk about a cheaper backup and one that could evolve into trade capital--or if Bryce can't find consistency-his replacement.  Round 3 will have some of these qbs--maybe early day 3.
×
×
  • Create New...