Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cutler Formally Requests Trade


dham278

Recommended Posts

It's shitty to see situations go so sour like that so quick. I must admit, I was talking major poo about Cutler at the Bronco's game this season, but if he was putting on a Panther's jersey every Sunday, I would have no problem with it.

I love Jake, but Cutler's someone we could give the keys to the team to for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has to be a starting QB so it would need to be Jake and Peppers or they might go for Moore and Peppers.

IF we were to make a trade like that we would have to include Jake I would imagine. I think it might would split the team if we were to trade for Cutler and still have Jake on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

give em Jake and Peppers for Cutler and a defensive player

Cutler and Moss for Peppers and Jake. They are switching to 3-4 defense and Moss would struggle under that system. By that trade at least we would have another DE with alot of athletic potential.

But this will not happen. Probably not anyways. Im still on the Moore train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

even if he were someone who would be a good fit for this team and would somehow become mature and not seen as a immature punk.....

1) we have nothing that they would want (they are not going to give him up without somehow being able to get a QB of like long term value (we have no one on this roster who fits the bill and no draft picks to help them toward that end)

2) we can't trade peppers

3) they are under no obligation to trade him

4) acquiring would be far too expensive (how much would we have to give up to get him?)

oh yeah....

221250AFIE_w.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow what a messed up situation...

You go from having an up and coming young pro bowl Quaterback, to who the hell know's what. Whoever will replace him won't be half as good, at least not this year.

I'd hate to be a bronco fan right now. To see your franchise Qb leave over something so silly, with no idea of an replacement. Sucks, just sucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McDaniels just isn't going to let his franchise quarterback leave without finding a decent quarterback to replace him.

Since he was willing to get rid of Cutler for Cassel, I'm not so sure he actually cares that much about having a decent quarterback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...