Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vote for rookie of the week....


Donald LaFell

Recommended Posts

So it's fair to say, since you use a separate trimmer, that you don't keep your junk clean?

I don't have time to trim junk, takes too much time to shave my back. :D

Well I keep it pretty clean, my wife sucks the ball sweat off on a regular basis. I'm just not keen on shaving next to my lips with the same device that I cut my dingleberry holding taint hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fine....to be honest I'm probably not "buddies" with them IRL. And to each their own. I know a lot of people that enjoy blue collar comedy for some unknown reason. Who am I to judge poor taste.

Back to the topic at hand. Your hatred for Cam Newton goes beyond his work ethic, leadership abilities, and on field performance to something that can only be interpreted as hardheadedness to the point of imbecility or racial bias. At least TRD attempted to use game tape and some semblance of football knowledge to back his claims. Now even people who were completely against the idea of drafting Cam have even come around to embracing him. JOAT I'm looking in your direction.

He wants attention. That's why he's joined to the hip with TRD that's why he always goes the opposite direction on almost everyone of his post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fine....to be honest I'm probably not "buddies" with them IRL. And to each their own. I know a lot of people that enjoy blue collar comedy for some unknown reason. Who am I to judge poor taste.

Back to the topic at hand. Your hatred for Cam Newton goes beyond his work ethic, leadership abilities, and on field performance to something that can only be interpreted as hardheadedness to the point of imbecility or racial bias. At least TRD attempted to use game tape and some semblance of football knowledge to back his claims. Now even people who were completely against the idea of drafting Cam have even come around to embracing him. JOAT I'm looking in your direction.

1)Didn't you make a topic on this very subject not to long ago. I believe i'm sticking to what i typed in answering your question.

2)I voted for Cobb, thought he had a great game. You do know Cobb is black right. I didn't vote for Kerrigan(white guy) i vote for Cobb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry sugar but Cobbs performance was pretty darn good. He helped his team to a victory over a playoff team with all eyes watching. I'm not going to give my vote to a player just because he's a Panther. Its not like i voted for Julio Jones or anything. And for the guy who neg rep'd me i'm sorry i hurt your feelings, but wins count just alittle bit more to me than stats and smiles.

Sorry but wins and loses are not by one single player. They come from a whole TEAM. Cam did everything he could to help his team win, but everyone else around him didn't step up. The voting isn't about how good the team played but how good an individual player played. Cobb couldn't hold Newton's jock Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...