Sean Considine Apparently Back As 53rd Player

[rodeo]

Kearse must not have impressed.

[Chaos]

I know we have what we have, and the FO seems content to start the season that way, but they signed Edwards for a reason. The moment he went down, or at least to IR, there should have been a signing to show there was emphasis to replace what was lost. Instead the D line only got younger and smaller.

[rfn]

I know we have what we have, and the FO seems content to start the season that way, but they signed Edwards for a reason. The moment he went down, or at least to IR, there should have been a signing to show there was emphasis to replace what was lost. Instead the D line only got younger and smaller.

yes but they're fast. The ball is snapped and they are 10 yards in their own backfield in a flash. The OL just is amazed as they try to find our DL.

[KillerKat]

idk if this is true. I dont see it reported from anywhere else. plus reed says we don't have to cut anyone, but if we did sign considine back we would be at 54 players now and would have to cut someone.

[MadHatter]

We are NOT going to sign a veteran DT or DE until after Week 1.....that way their salary is not guaranteed.

Our 3 DT's will struggle Sunday and we will sign someone early next week.