We must be shopping Connor

[Carl Spackler]

I think it's because we need the depth at that position because 2 of the 3 starters have injury concerns. For some reason people on here are against the concept of actually having depth at a position.

[rmoneyg35]

I think it's because we need the depth at that position because 2 of the 3 starters have injury concerns. For some reason people on here are against the concept of actually having depth at a position.

They would rather us cut a linebacker for a washed up Corner or DT.

[Jrock88]

I just don't know what kind of return we could get for Connor to make it worth it. How much trade value can he realistically have?

[rmoneyg35]

I just don't know what kind of return we could get for Connor to make it worth it. How much trade value can he realistically have?

I would hope atleast a 3rd but probably no more than a 4th or 5th

[Jai.]

If the return on him is a starting caliber cb or dt, then adios.

[pantherclaw]

The bears wanted conner, we refused to ship him then, which leads me to believe they won't now.

[Miaoww]

make sure u package clausen with connor.

I hate this fan base, I really do.

[Kurb]

Who is Connors?

[Mr. Scot]

Who is Connors?

Mannix!

[jtnc]

Makes sense, get something while you have him. Cause this is last year on his contract.

[CatMan72]

I have a feeling we're still talking to Philly about Connor for Samuel... almost makes too much sense not to happen. I think our announcement that we're going to use Godfrey in the slot is our way of letting Philly know we're ready to move on if they won't lower the asking price.

[Jrock88]

for Connor straight up maybe, forget our 2nd round choice though, PHILTHY