Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Clowney waived, yet Armanti makes the team again?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

This is Armanti's year that his pick was used. He's had exactly one lameduck year to progress. Clowney has had one 4 years in the league and has done a whole lot of jack sh!t. Armanti has shown more flashes this preseason at two positions than Clowney has. Clowney caught one long pass against 3rd stringers whoopy.

Clausen has had one 'lameduck year' to progress too, yet 90% of you want to lynch him.

What's the difference? Is it where they went to college?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can never tell which justification method the huddle's logic is going to apply to the subject SMF, so there is no reason to argue. Some rookies suck because Fox was a lame duck and other rookies seem to be a bust because they couldn't play under a lame duck coach. Other rookies suck because someone else sucked (o-line). It really depends on the personal bias of the commentator.

I understand the switch to WR...and I also understand the first step is to field punts. So how many years are we giving AE to be able to do this? .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...