Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brandon Tate May Be Odd Man Out in New England


Ruff

Recommended Posts

To the people saying we need to fix OL, CB, DT, etc: Why can't we do both? It's not like you have to choose one or the other. Right now, WR is a position of need, not as much as DT or CB, but, this is a player that would probably be playing for the 2-year minimum (whatever it is now), has vertical speed in a vertical offense, and is just playing behind a 100 other receivers in New England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WR could use help, but we gotta fix the trenches first. If our line play doesn't improve dramatically, it's going to be a long, ugly season yet again.

if a WR comes along that shows promise, you would ignore it just because?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if a WR comes along that shows promise, you would ignore it just because?

If he's shown so much promise as a receiver, why is he being cut from one of the most pass happy teams in the league? He's shown no more than Lafell or Naanee. His best attribute is as a kick returner, which we don't need because A) Mike Goodson and B) the new kickoff rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he's shown so much promise as a receiver, why is he being cut from one of the most pass happy teams in the league? He's shown no more than Lafell or Naanee. His best attribute is as a kick returner, which we don't need because A) Mike Goodson and B) the new kickoff rules.

Do you not believe a guy who has spent two years in the league, under a pass offense like ours, is immediately better than Charly Martin, Pilares, etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he's shown so much promise as a receiver, why is he being cut from one of the most pass happy teams in the league? He's shown no more than Lafell or Naanee. His best attribute is as a kick returner, which we don't need because A) Mike Goodson and B) the new kickoff rules.

that's a question you'll have to ask Rivera..

doesn't mean he doesn't possess more talent than either player on our team.. if the coaching staff doesn't see enough, so be it.

the point of my question wasn't answered though. . should a receiver come along, are you all saying you would ignore it just because?

rhetorical question, obviously we should take the WR should it be a good match..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you not believe a guy who has spent two years in the league, under a pass offense like ours, is immediately better than Charly Martin, Pilares, etc?

No, I don't think he's better than Charly Martin. Martin is a highly skilled special teams player, which we don't have many of, plus he can play a little receiver. Tate is a highly skilled kick returner, which we already have a few of those, and can play a little receiver.

Due to this, Martin adds a lot more value to this team than Tate would.

the point of my question wasn't answered though. . should a receiver come along, are you all saying you would ignore it just because?

rhetorical question, obviously we should take the WR should it be a good match..

Should we take a player that has shown more than the young talent we already have on the roster? Of course. Is that player Brandon Tate? No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I don't think he's better than Charly Martin. Martin is a highly skilled special teams player, which we don't have many of, plus he can play a little receiver. Tate is a highly skilled kick returner, which we already have a few of those, and can play a little receiver.

Due to this, Martin adds a lot more value to this team than Tate would.

Wow. You must be a State fan, right?

Or is it Duke?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...