Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers' cuts

Icege

By Icege,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Razeyfingers Newbie

Razeyfingers

Posted
Posted

ask and you shall receive I s'pose

This team has a lot to prove and Gamble is part of that. To say he's done after a lame duck year and after one game after coming off a very lengthy illness of some sort (implying that it was somewhat serious and put him behind) doesnt make any sense to me. If you want productivity then watch some film. He's plenty productive in every game he plays. It just takes looking farther than a stat sheet or focusing on just him in order to see it.

Part of playing competitive sports is all about people saying "you cant do it" or "you're washed up", but a wiser man would recognize that these guys have beaten incredible odds to be where they are. Athletes are extremely driven people. The ones who have proved themselves in the pros even more so.

You just dont give up on talent thats proven itself before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scarface Rookie

scarface

Posted
Posted

And if you limit yourself to players currently on the team, then 1) you lack imagination, and 2) insinuating that Gamble needs to be on this team is a stupid, ill-informed suggestion.

I repeat exactly what I said in the beginning. Gamble's a pathetic, soft player, who used to be good, and the Panthers can probably pick up some guys who get cut who would be twice as productive as the Chris & Captain duo.

This team shouldn't lock itself into Gamble, or Captain. There will be better options out there than him, therefore, he can be cut, duh.

"Swag" = groupthink, therefore, I don't give a crap about it. Give me as much negative as possible, you're still wrong. :yesnod:

196769d1298328373-saving-money-gaming-notebook-sugestions-wtf-am-i-reading.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rook35200 Newbie

Rook35200

Posted
Posted

There's a difference between "better" and "more productive".

The former is a qualitative, personal opinion. The latter can be easily measured on the field.

Fans rely on the first in their decision making, I'm focusing on productivity. Gamble years ago, may have been more productive, but to suggest there won't be any guys that they can pick up after Saturday who can probably do more good on the field than Gamble has recently, is just lazy thinking.

Chris Gamble = Everette Brown.

WTF are u smokin?!?! Who do u think will be cut from other teams whi can replace gamble and how do u think they will be more productive/better than

Gamble???? Don't worry I'll wait(in my Katt Williams voice)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCP Enthusiast

SCP

Posted
Posted

Who's the last player you've heard of being cut after the 4th preseason game who has been more productive over a quality/proven starter

Good point but have you seen our two-deep at DT, CB, and RG? We may be the first to find starters that are better than our current players at all 3 poitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyclonus Newbie

Cyclonus

Posted
Posted

Who's the last player you've heard of being cut after the 4th preseason game who has been more productive over a quality/proven starter

Typically you're right. But Gamble hasn't been a quality starter for a few years now. Just because he's the best the Panthers have doesn't mean he's quality!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...