Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam is not ready


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

I'll retract my earlier statements somewhat. For what it's worht, Cam has looked pretty decent in flashes.

But this offense as a whole is just abysmal. With better O-line protection, and more discipline (ie: fuking pass protection) He should do fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dalton "rushed" for -6 yards :P

still who the f cares, Cam's playing their 2nd string defense. if he's ready to start, he should be lighting it up. I'm tired of blaming everyone but the quarterback.

People r blaming Cam......just acknowledging the finger doesn't just point at him alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dalton "rushed" for -6 yards :P

still who the f cares, Cam's playing their 2nd string defense. if he's ready to start, he should be lighting it up. I'm tired of blaming everyone but the quarterback.

How can you blame the quarterback when the last series consisted of 3 running plays that went no where and the only bright spot was a completed pass for a first down that was called back for holding?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, Dalton isn't doing more overall for his team.....

And again, the point is Cam is our QB and needs the reps.....pulling and bragging about him being not ready is beyond lame. but clearly that is what you r going for

Doing more for his team?

They have absolutely no talent, that's what everyone was saying.

Now he's surrounded by probowlers and just needs to not fug it up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, Dalton isn't doing more overall for his team.....

you're crazy... he's done far more for them than Cam has done for us this game.

Dalton is making nearly every throw, finding openings, changing plays at the line of scrimmage. Dalton played very well against a bad defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doing more for his team?

They have absolutely no talent, that's what everyone was saying.

Now he's surrounded by probowlers and just needs to not fug it up?

Dalton isn't running through the Panther D like they r a wet paper bag. The score isn't what it is bc of Dalton vs Cam. it is what it is bc of the Cincy OL/DL vs the Panther OL/DL........remember like TRD said in the VY debate....wins and losses are about the team play not QB play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...