Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam is not ready

The Saltman

By The Saltman,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

The numbers aren't telling of the game. The first drive, the OL ended up in Cam's lap within 2 seconds. Not to mention the pocket collapsing constantly. And we can't get the run set up to slow down the blitz because the OL sucks. Dalton is succeeding because the Bengals can ran straight through us. Not because he's playing better. Cam has looked OK tonight. Made some good decisions. Don't just look at numbers and say "terrible." Actually watch the game. He's not going to look like an all-star folks. NFL starter =/= pro-bowl material. He'll be fine. OL needs to quit sucking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Does he?

So far I see 75 and 49 = 124 vs 130

Just shows how pathetic the Cam huggers are...trying to fool everyone

Dalton accounted for negative yards as well....but you missed the point I was making. Dalton wasn't providing more offense for his team......our highly touted backfield is pathetic giving Cam no help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

Bengals are one of the "no talent" teams in the NFL. 0-2 so far this pre season. But tonight, their second round rookie QB is playing well. He keeps the D honest with his passing ability. Cam instills fear in no one except half the fan base. He will be running for his life as D's will not respect his passing ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Dalton lost those reps too...

Again, Dalton isn't doing more overall for his team.....

And again, the point is Cam is our QB and needs the reps.....pulling and bragging about him being not ready is beyond lame. but clearly that is what you r going for

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...