Scouts Inc top 200 players

[Dpantherman]

yeah, but one year?

sum of those sacks came in garbage time LY when the tackles knew the game was already over.

I stand by my statement that the cats overpaid for this guy b/c he was headed to ATL.

So you never watched him come in during rotations. Because the folks that evaluate players for a living recognize that CJ was effective even playing behind peppers. And the garbage time argument blows.

[HeatCheck]

Charles Johnson, our best player? Don't think so.

[jtnc]

Johnson is nowhere near the leader or type of player Beason is.

[Cat'sGrowl]

Johnson over Beason?

Hilarious!

[TheRealDeal]

Let me try...Johnson over Beason? :lol::lol::lol::lol:

Can't believe they are so dumb, dumbasses.

:lol: Johnson over Beason, no chance son!

[Dpantherman]

That said, after seeing the rankings, its poo. CJ belongs in the top 200, Beason's spot is pure bullpoo.

[blak-n-blu]

Jon Beason, our fifth-ranked middle linebacker over the past three years, a tad overrated at times, but a playmaker and force on the defense.

Get over it. Go and read some of my old post.

[CRA]

CJ was better on the field last year....

Beason was lost often the first half of the year.....

So...I don't agree with but if you just use last in order to rank guys it ain't that crazy. but then that doesn't explain Gamble so who knows

[edromeo]

Chris Gamble 136

[Raleighcat83]

For people saying Beason is better than Johnson, I agree, he's better at his position. But his position is less valuable. That's why they both got contracts but CJ got a lot more. But yeah, Gamble doesn't make sense. BTW, Travelle Wharton is an underrated player, probably deserves top 200 status.

[jtnc]

Seems like they're going by contracts, and not by talent.

[PanthersFan8912]

Seems like they're going by contracts, and not by talent.

this:mad2:

[CatMan72]

Charles Johnson better than Beason?

[CatMan72]

Gamble # 136

Jay Cutler # 137

LOL, where's Dimbee?