Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton starter vs Bengals, Week 1 starter TBD

Sword

By Sword,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted

Perhaps, but that would massively lean things in Clausen's favor, because very few teams are going to play starters in game 4 for more than a quarter at most and if he takes out our starters, jimmy will be playing with our 2nd team which may make a difficult comparison. Still, you may be right.

I think he really wanted one of the guys to step up in these games and neither did so he's just going to go with the one with more upside.

I think you judge them each just on how they throw and what decisions they make given the certain circumstances. If Rivera does do the same for Jimmy in game 4 and he is still checking down against 2nd and 3rd stringers, I don't think he would be helping himself at all. But if he takes chances down field, and if the ball is on target, then I think that would help his chances greatly no matter if the ball is dropped or a defender makes a good play on it. But also keep in mind that Clausen would be playing with our backup OL which has been bad all preseason. The QB who does the best given the certain circumstances and other factors will become our week 1 starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jpjr Newbie

Jpjr

Posted
Posted

I like Rivera's call.

Give Cam a full offensive gameplan, starters for 3 quarters, shi**y Bengals... if he can't get it done then sit him. If he can, he goes. My guess is he does pretty well and starts the season even if he melts down thereafter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted

Guys, he hasn't been handed the keys yet, he's just taking a test drive.

If they reverse this for next week, giving Clausen 3 quarters, it'll make for some good headlines, but Cam should do better since he is going against the Bengals and next week we get the Steelers.

In week 4, teams play almost exclusively scrubs, so I don't know that we will learn much against the Steelers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ItsPantone278 Newbie

ItsPantone278

Posted
Posted

Simple. You don't name a "starter" before you have to, so that you don't have to "bench" someone when you absolutely have to.

With that said, the writing is on the wall people. Its Cam time. Lets see how he handles the load, and so long as he doesn't go out there missing we can expect the keys to handed over. For those saying its obvious what we want to do, we drafted the guy number 1 overall.

In other news, no mention of Gamble being out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

In week 4, teams play almost exclusively scrubs, so I don't know that we will learn much against the Steelers.

While you're kind of right, Killerkat was on when he said they'd pay more attention what he does as opposed to the results of plays etc. It's much tougher for sure because Jimmy will be playing with our scrubs too for the most part, but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mav1234 Grand Master

mav1234

Posted
Posted

In other news, no mention of Gamble being out.

billvoth Bill Voth

Yes and yes RT @JNashty88: @billvoth Did Gamble and/or 89 practice today?

cause he's not out :) hopefully he can play, goddamn I want to see our defense fully loaded vs Cinci.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...