Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What I'm doing on Sunday


Guild

Recommended Posts

I saw it on the news also...they said there was a total of 12 girls (if you could call them that) and then they showed the crowd and it was hundreds of guys that were climbing all over each other trying to get pictures because eventhough they were 40, I am pretty sure it was the first time most of them saw a womans boob in real life

Did I hear that the group that organized this is a cult type thing that believes alien scientist created and control mankind? I am just trying to see the connection.

Way more than 12 women. Look up the videos at the Mountain Xpress website.

Yeah totally organized by an alien cult. Not even kidding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't see how any part of the naked body is different than any other. Present this belief system to tribal people in Africa or the Amazon, some of which see no problem walking around completely naked. It's the way we are.

Not sure what's got you so upset. Whining and screaming in an internet post and throwing insults. You should try to be more mature and civil.

Whiskey.

I still think your analogy sucks though. If you want to discuss your views on nudity being acceptable in public or not please do it in another thread.

Also I didn't whine or scream, and saying "try to be more mature and civil." Is a surefire way to get the exact opposite.

Haha you negrepped me. What a ***.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...