Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What I'm doing on Sunday


Guild

Recommended Posts

Wait till you see who shows up. You won't support the cause anymore.

Trust me I have no illusions about what will actually be out there (body hair). Should still be fun times. Downtown is packed full of bars and this sort of thing will lead to awesome parties. To bad I have to work Monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait till you see who shows up. You won't support the cause anymore.

It's more the spectacle than anything. Plus, just like anyone who attended a Slutwalk knows, there always tends to be a couple young drunk girls ready to take their tops off for anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a good time. Right at the end some bitch wanted to be a real downer but overall everyone was having some innocent topless fun. I have pictures but will not be posting them publicly. If you request I may share some with you.

I would go to another one. Hopefully if there is one more women will turnout topless but overall for a city the size of Asheville there was a good turnout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been to Ashville. I don't want to see those hippy chicks without a shirt.

Were definitely some good ones. Plenty of not so good ones though.

One chick had an $8000 pair. She let me photograph them of course. Probably could have touched them (she and her husband were cool) but I guess I was too shy to ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...