Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN First Take


dpanther69

Recommended Posts

On ESPN First Take,the fans voted for them to discuss "Will Cam Newton turn this Panthers Around". It was discuss on 4th Down portion on their 1st and 10 segment. Jamele started off by saying that he has the potential to be this years Sam Bradford. Both Michael Smith and Jamele Hill agreed that he will turn the franchise around that he will energize the team and that we should win about 6 games this year. Michael Smith also said that we aren't as bad as our 2-14 record of last year. They also feel that he needs to work on his accuracy issues. Michael Smith also stated that Cam reminds him of Vince Young when he came out college in that he wasn't pretty but he knew how to win. They both didn't feel that Clausen is the answer and starting him will lead to drafting a number 1 draft pick again. I feel this coaching staff alone makes us a better team and I hope that they will be able to keep these guys hungry and humble and not get caught up with all the media hype that they have received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a couple advantages that newton has over VY is that he 1) has his head on straight and is and can handle criticism better and 2) he is in a less dysfunctional situation than VY was.

he should have more success. i will say that if newton can come close to VY's rookie season as far as success is concerned i will be most happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ESPN First Take,the fans voted for them to discuss "Will Cam Newton turn this Panthers Around". It was discuss on 4th Down portion on their 1st and 10 segment. Jamele started off by saying that he has the potential to be this years Sam Bradford. Both Michael Smith and Jamele Hill agreed that he will turn the franchise around that he will energize the team and that we should win about 6 games this year. Michael Smith also said that we aren't as bad as our 2-14 record of last year. They also feel that he needs to work on his accuracy issues. Michael Smith also stated that Cam reminds him of Vince Young when he came out college in that he wasn't pretty but he knew how to win. They both didn't feel that Clausen is the answer and starting him will lead to drafting a number 1 draft pick again. I feel this coaching staff alone makes us a better team and I hope that they will be able to keep these guys hungry and humble and not get caught up with all the media hype that they have received.

I hate the Cam Newton = Vince Young comparison. Don't get me wrong, I get it, but I don't like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree w/ them if we sit him this year and start Clausen we are in the Luck race.....start Cam and we aren't.

I think the VY and Vick comparisons are fair b/c there are clear traits about his game he shares w/ them. Russell is just a lazy comparison. Just b/c there are comparisons to be made doesn' t mean there aren't clear differences.

Never seen a QB to date play as well under pressure/the media's eye as Newton in college. His physical skill set also hasn't been seen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a couple advantages that newton has over VY is that he 1) has his head on straight and is and can handle criticism better and 2) he is in a less dysfunctional situation than VY was.

he should have more success. i will say that if newton can come close to VY's rookie season as far as success is concerned i will be most happy.

IMO, I believe this whole VY is "dysfuntional ish" is ridiculous. Everyone handles pressure differently. That doesn't make them dysfunctonal just because the media said so. Carson Palmer showed his immaturity by pouting and demanding to be traded. No one in the media labeled him as dysfunctional or immature.

Anyway, unlike a lot of these QBs who are treated like rock stars in college, Cam felt the wrath of the media at the peak of his success in college and handled it with grace and class. And during the draft season had to endure ridicule and stereoptyical accusations and he rised above that also.

Does that make him better than VY, or any of the QBs? Maybe, maybe not..But as they say, the true test of a man's character isn't when things are going well but when they are not. And so far Cam has proven the ability to handle adversity very well. I hope it continues cause what doesn't break u really does strengthens you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam Newton = Black QB = He will be a mix of Vince Young, Jamarcus Russell, and Mike Vick :rollseyes:

Something tells me if there were more successful black QBs in the NFL then whites and Cam was white, he'd be compared to them because everyone knows that psychologically, you comparing someone to the best, paints them as the best, even if it's not reality. Hence the fact that during the draft Blaine Gabbert was always being compared to Sam Bradford and Matt Sanford, even thou he had no background to back it up.

I'm seriously not buying the "it's obvious, what do u expect" excuse. Those in the media r way to smart for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with the "Cam can turn around Panthers" talk. Quarterback play was really bad last year but the injury bug hit the team pretty hard. With a healthy team, Cam can HELP turn the teams record around from last season. As a healthy team the Panthers are a very competitive, something they were not last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with the "Cam can turn around Panthers" talk. Quarterback play was really bad last year but the injury bug hit the team pretty hard. With a healthy team, Cam can HELP turn the teams record around from last season. As a healthy team the Panthers are a very competitive, something they were not last season.

injury bug wasn't as bad as some hype it.

Look at how Matt Moore came in at the end of 2009 (with a comparable injury bitten team).....and rolled. QB easily the biggest problem. You could of given Clausen a 100% healthy team and there was little suggest that would have made much of a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...