Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

From Yas Blog


carolinarolls

Recommended Posts

I have never seen this stat before. Kinda neat and what most were thinking I hope.

KC Joyner just passed along a copy of "The Football Scientist Fantasy Football Draft Guide" for 2011. You can order the book here, but let’s give you a few highlights from around the NFC South.

On Carolina, Joyner wrote: “The Panthers had something of an odd mixture of run blocking statistics. Their running backs fared quite well in the good blocking yards per attempt (GBYPA) category. This metric gauges how productive a running back is when he is given a good blocking situation (loosely defined as when the blockers do not allow the defense to do anything to disrupt a running play). Carolina’s ball carriers had this type of situation on 176 rushing attempts last year and gained 1,410 yards on those plays for a GBYPA of 8.0 (2nd best in the league).

“Now look at the flip side. The Panthers had a poor blocking situation (loosely defined as when the blockers allow the defense to do something to disrupt the play) on 222 of their rushing attempts. That means they posted a win block situation on only 40.8 percent of their rushing attempts, a total that was the 3rd lowest in that category. What this means is that for all of the talk about what Cam Newton will bring to this offense, if the Panthers can find a way to improve their run blocking, it might do as much as help turn things around as anything else they do on offense.’’

Agreed, but I also think the threat of Newton as a passer and a runner is going to make life easier for the running backs.

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of that is due to stewart playing more as he is pretty easy to bring down if you can get him moving sideways or get him in the backfield. Williams is really the only back of choice when the line is not playing well.

That is a good point. I always felt like the line was struggling. It was nice to see that @60 or percent of the time they failed to block their assignment. Another contributing factor was opponents being able to key on the run as we did not really have a passing threat for most of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of that is due to stewart playing more as he is pretty easy to bring down if you can get him moving sideways or get him in the backfield. Williams is really the only back of choice when the line is not playing well.

or, its just incredibly easy to get in the backfield when there is no fear of a passing game and you have 8/9 people in the box.

blocking could've been better, sure - but if we had any passing threat last year, those percentiles would flip between good and bad blocking situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or, its just incredibly easy to get in the backfield when there is no fear of a passing game and you have 8/9 people in the box.

blocking could've been better, sure - but if we had any passing threat last year, those percentiles would flip between good and bad blocking situations.

My comment isn't really dependent on the other variables. Stewart's style of running doesn't change no matter what. He certainly will be more effective if the passing game plays well and otah is back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or, its just incredibly easy to get in the backfield when there is no fear of a passing game and you have 8/9 people in the box.

blocking could've been better, sure - but if we had any passing threat last year, those percentiles would flip between good and bad blocking situations.

not to mention that our plays were so predictable in the first place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...