Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coryellpedia


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

what needs to be incorporated in the discussion is what defenses could or could NOT do back then. stick em anyone? bump and run?

Thats the beauty of football to me. the ebb and flow and trends that force teams to adapt, whether it be talent, rules or formations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what needs to be incorporated in the discussion is what defenses could or could NOT do back then. stick em anyone? bump and run?

Thats the beauty of football to me. the ebb and flow and trends that force teams to adapt, whether it be talent, rules or formations.

part of why the passing game is soooo prevalent right now is because many more rules have been created against defenses as far as contact goes in the first place. It's part of why even rookie QBs are more successful and WRs can get open more. It's our time, and way overdue at this point for us to join the other teams in exploiting the benefits of those rules. The NFL hasn't made running the ball easier over time than passing the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At it's core, the Coryell system is all about power running and vertical passing. That's it, nothing fancy about it. And just about every team in the NFL that isn't running a West Coast Offense runs the Erhardt-Perkins system we just left, or a variation of Coryell. Coryell can be done with anywhere from two to five receivers, it can include the Tight End as a receiver, as a blocker, or both. It's all about precise routes, play-action, and power running (Why else do you think John Fox allowed in in Carolina for so long?).

http://www.derp/2011/2/5/1975521/so-what-will-the-offense-look-like-in-2011-part-one

Today I'm taking a less in depth approach and looking purely at the statistics from three different seasons, the Carolina Panthers successful 2008 campaign, the 2010 San Diego Chargers where Chudzinski was the assistant head coach and the 2007 Cleveland Browns where Chud was the offensive coordinator. The words of St. Pete Times writer Greg Auman served as the catalyst for this discovery as he said yesterday over this

http://www.derp/2011/6/1/2200621/getting-to-brass-tacks-what-will-be-the-differences-in-chudzinskis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another very valuable reference for our offense. The route trees are probably covering the basics of what the WRs and TEs are being instructed by our offensive coaches. I wish the last image in the first link was stapled to every TE's head from 2003-2010.

http://footballpressbox.blogspot.com/2010/10/real-wco-air-coryell-series.html

http://footballpressbox.blogspot.com/2010/10/air-coryell-series-part-ii-525-f-post.html

This one illustrates the F-post they were talking about in the article I posted in the OP in one variation.

http://footballpressbox.blogspot.com/2010/10/air-coryell-series-part-iii-notable.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea. even though we ran AC with Fox here with Henning, it was more of a passing complement to the running game. At least it was built to be. Fox is a guy who will invest his time into building and developing a no.1 running game, which, even today is a good idea, but the problem is, he doesn't really care about the passing game, about developing QBs and looking for a very good 2nd WR that can stretch the defense vertically. He doesn't think of a young QB as an asset, he'd rather just get a vet he can rely on getting a completion/first down/TD when he needs him to.

steve smith, moose, ricky proehl.

That says the passing game was important to fox.

The talent lost, never got properly replaced. Whether it was draft picks that didn't develop, or free agents that didn't pan out.

Coaches can only work with what they have.

The Panthers were #2 in the league for most passes of 40 + yards in 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, because in 2003 the panthers were tied with 4 other teams for 4th place, not 2nd.
not quite how i remember it...but the point remains the same.

The Panthers offense was also one of the most balanced in the league that year, heading into, and throughout the playoff run they made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes and nothing proves a point like a very inconsistent stat. what about the point that fox inherited 2 of those guys? and Proehl, money as he could be in the slot, was not a very good no.2 receiver. and what does the third sentence about how the talent never got replaced do anything but prove my point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea. even though we ran AC with Fox here with Henning, it was more of a passing complement to the running game. At least it was built to be. Fox is a guy who will invest his time into building and developing a no.1 running game, which, even today is a good idea, but the problem is, he doesn't really care about the passing game, about developing QBs and looking for a very good 2nd WR that can stretch the defense vertically. He doesn't think of a young QB as an asset, he'd rather just get a vet he can rely on getting a completion/first down/TD when he needs him to.
100% dead on.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good.  fug Brian Kelly.  Fake ass bitch.  
    • I stopped watching after the first series in the second half because  Losing  to better teams  is one thing, but blowouts?  .and those blowouts happen far too often …they are becoming his MO as HC against better teams  I do not think Young’s being in would’ve made any difference    Why? Against the 31st run defense in the league,   he came out throwing….who didn’t know that was going to happen.    Throwing against a team that was ranked 31st against the run is mind boggling when the Panthers strength is running the ball  His personnel packages are totally predictable  (Horn)    he makes no adjustments for what he sees on the field  .He appears to have  zero game day control or communication with Evero.   Canales single handedly neutered  a player that had 400 plus yards in 2 games ….that takes some real genius there.   I read he was ‘researching’ how to use 2 running backs effectively i mean, for  fug sake, are you kidding me.  Had the ball to Rico. When he gets tired, bring in Hubbard.  This is not hard   I feel sorry for the Panthers fans who  sat through that today    
    • There is no excuse. I can't get past his decision making. If Dave thought the last game and this game were the right game plans and the guys just didnt execute, well you cant have someone like that anywhere near the team. It's just means his intellect is far below bad. Though I don't think it was just Dave being really really stupid when it comes to playing football.  I'm sorry, but this has Tepper's fingerprints all over it. There are only two things I think happened. Tepper is telling these coaches what is going to happen in game. If Tepper is still doing this, you can go ahead and forget the Panthers while he is there. If he is STILL telling coaches what they will do, it is completely over for the Panthers. He is too dumb to give any input. If Tepper is coaching, we would be better with no coach. He is really that stupid. But there is a good chance they threw that game. Everyone better hope that the Pamthers threw that game (I honestly don't see how they couldnt have thrown it.) Only people who watched the game would really understand what happened. If you watched the game you know. But we better hope we get caught throwing games and the team gets absolutely destroyed. But that they find out Tepper was involved and they have to kick him out of the league. This is the absolute best scenario for the Panthers. And no, I'm not joking. This is the chance to get Tepper out. The internet needs to find a connection to Tepper, or the Panthers are done. Tepper is really that stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...