Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stanford and Wilson


Peppers90 NC

Recommended Posts

I'm going to take last weeks game with a grain of salt, but I just want to say I was impressed with our starting corners, for what it was. Maybe the wet field conditions helped, but they both played hard and shut down two very good wr's. Both played physical, and had just enough jam on Nicks on that one play where it appears Eli overthrew him, but could it have been from lack of release?

I know in Philly, the aggressive scheme sometime exposed weak corner play, but last week it may have helped it. I watched the game on the NYC local channel so there wasn't much coverage on our team, but from my eyes, they played pretty decent for 3 and 4 corners. I'm wondering if Burney will even make the team because McClain seemed to do pretty well too. Did I miss anything to make me think otherwise?

Please, anyone help me curb my enthusiasm in thinking we might possibly not be as bad off at corner as we are all assuming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looked to me like CB was not a hole at all considering Stanford and McClain are our #3 and #4 CBs. Excited to see Gamble and Munny start.

I think the Giants also just flat out sucked that night.....saw some guys get beat we just didn't pay for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats because carolina no longer practices the Bend but dont break philosiphy. In the past, our cb's would allow wr to catch the small stuff but make sure they make the tackle so they dont get a big gain. Now, our cb's have free reign to contend every pass and play the position the way it should be played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...