Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyrell Sutton


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

We have other guys that can do what Sutton does and that leaves us room to carry more guys in 1 weaker area instead of being stacked at one of our strongest, if not strongest, areas of the team. Ben Hartsock is a very good blocker. If Fiammetta went down, he would be the guy to step in. We also have a lot of young talent at WR, but also contains question marks.

So with us not having to carry 4 RBs, we will be able to carry 6 WRs. We also have Goodson, Munnerlyn, and Pilares to do returns. I think the only way Sutton makes it is if Goodson continues his fumbling problems and is either cut or traded. I also wouldn't put much stock in Vaughn starting over Sutton yesterday. It's just part of seeing what we have in other players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sutton keeps dropping the ball, dude needs to walk.

Please do us Packers fans a favor and send T-Sutt back our way. I doubt we will make the same mistake twice.

One of the least justified, most illogical cuts in Packers' history, in my opinion. If he can make a team with arguably the best running backs in the NFL, the Panthers, how could he NOT be a keeper on the Packers' roster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please do us Packers fans a favor and send T-Sutt back our way. I doubt we will make the same mistake twice.

One of the least justified, most illogical cuts in Packers' history, in my opinion. If he can make a team with arguably the best running backs in the NFL, the Panthers, how could he NOT be a keeper on the Packers' roster?

What would the Packers be willing to trade to get Sutton?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please do us Packers fans a favor and send T-Sutt back our way. I doubt we will make the same mistake twice.

One of the least justified, most illogical cuts in Packers' history, in my opinion. If he can make a team with arguably the best running backs in the NFL, the Panthers, how could he NOT be a keeper on the Packers' roster?

Not sure why sut was 4th string yesterday but he isn't getting cut. Glad to see a Packers fan gets what some Panther fans don't. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...