Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Exactly how i said it would go down


Recommended Posts

So no one who actually has enough experience to know what they are talking about should be able to post? IMO, no with with SWAG under a million should be able to post. ;)

Yes because clearly TruCatz and TRD are our most reputable and classiest posters.

Eh I got nuttin but love for both of ya but yall know what Im sayin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes because clearly TruCatz and TRD are our most reputable and classiest posters.

Eh I got nuttin but love for both of ya but yall know what Im sayin.

I think I've contributed a lot of good discussion and insight to this board.

Not lately, but no one really has lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About two months ago, we got into an argument (BLEY, RAYZOR, IVAN THE A$$KI$$ER and a few others)

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/62327-i-see-us-making-a-splash-with-a-wr.html

Where It was said I was so stupid, ignorant and uninformed about OUR team because I said we would not go after a BIG NAMED WR.

My belief that Gettis and LaFell along with our other WRs would be all we would need coming into the season. So unless you consider Naame a top flight WR...(which I also said we might go after a lower tier player) And being there really isn't any other TOP FLIGHT WRs left. I can pretty safely say I was right.

While being right isn't my point. Having a valid opinion and because it isn't what the majority agrees with doesn't mean I AM WRONG, STUPID, IGNORANT or MISINFORMED.

If you don't agree with me....that is your opinion but doesn't give you the right to call anyone names or anything else.

The majority of what has happened since the Lockout was lifted has gone pretty much the way I thought it would.. With the except of the TE situation.

Though I am sure your egos will prevent you from apologizing, not for your opinions, but for your rude and unnecessary insults.

Those of you that do...thanks

Those of you that don't... I WAS RIGHT,,, YOU WERE WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Greg Olsen says STFU...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His point is this: He had an opinion that was not popular on the Huddle. Instead of engaging in healthy debate and discussion, he had to endure insults and one-liners from people who, he feels, cannot handle opposition constructively. So, he allowed time to pass, and revisited the topic. That is the only way to explose the people who insult and ridicule opinions other than their own. I get what he is saying.
is that what i did?

please point out where i was rude in that thread and didn't get involved in healthy debate. actually, all those guys debated with him. it wasn't an argument and it didn't get ugly until this dave guy started overreacting to people he didn't agree with. he talks about how people don't tolerate his opinion, but he almost views anyone that disagrees with him as an attack on him.

sorry for hijacking the food thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is that what i did?

please point out where i was rude in that thread and didn't get involved in healthy debate. actually, all those guys debated with him. it wasn't an argument and it didn't get ugly until this dave guy started overreacting to people he didn't agree with. he talks about how people don't tolerate his opinion, but he almost views anyone that disagrees with him as an attack on him.

sorry for hijacking the food thread.

I actually read the whole thread and in no moment did I see you or anyone else insult him. Call him ignorant, stupid or whatever else he claims people were doing.

I'm the one that called him a "sad little man" only after I quoted him calling me "IvanTheA$$kisser", because I was giving pie/props to you, bleys, hell almost everyone that had a valid point.

In the same thread, I saw a lot instances where he blew up on people for their opinions. He's a hypocrite, plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His point is this: He had an opinion that was not popular on the Huddle. Instead of engaging in healthy debate and discussion, he had to endure insults and one-liners from people who, he feels, cannot handle opposition constructively. So, he allowed time to pass, and revisited the topic. That is the only way to explose the people who insult and ridicule opinions other than their own. I get what he is saying.

incredible foresight.. although you didn't point out the incredible irony that would occur, considering DavePanther is still wrong..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...