Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anybody else tired of hearing swag


chef17

Recommended Posts

swag (s.w.a.g.)

Sista with a gun. Refers to an African-American female who is "packin' heat", or carries a firearm on her person.

"Ay, don't mess with a swag (s.w.a.g.), she'll put you in the grave, boy!"

"That swag is dangerous, stay away from her."

zjb320.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do understand the point of the thread though. 'Swag' to me feels 5 years old already. The other day channel surfing they had a all-star under armor softball game. It was Team Swagger vs. Team Hype...wtf. I don't know, when you have 40 year old sports casters using it it kinda kills the point real quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577 https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577   https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577 https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577 https://www.devex.com/people/como-llamar-a-united-airlines-desde-republica-dominicana-2139577
    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
×
×
  • Create New...