Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who is better than Steve Smith in his prime?


OneBadassCat

Recommended Posts

Did you ever see Harrison play?

I have. Have you ever seen a receiver not post great numbers with Manning as his qb? Last season said it all. With all the injuries the Colts suffered at the WR position, Manning still managed to put up great numbers with backups as his starters.

Look at the ridiculous numbers Jacob Tamme posted last season when Dallas Clark went down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have. Have you ever seen a receiver not post great numbers with Manning as his qb? Last season said it all. With all the injuries the Colts suffered at the WR position, Manning still managed to put up great numbers with backups as his starters.

Look at the ridiculous numbers Jacob Tamme posted last season when Dallas Clark went down.

A lot of people put Marvin Harrison in the top 5 of all time receivers. I don't think I've seen Steve Smith make the top 25 in any list. See if you can find one other than your own list.

I've attached a link as an example. Harrison is number TWO on this list.http://bleacherreport.com/articles/330608-the-100-greatest-wide-receivers-in-nfl-history-nos-25-1/page/25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought Muhsin Muhammed was a pretty darn good receiver in his prime. Thanks for straightening me out on that.

Moose left after the 2004 season, the year before Steve Smith grabbed the league by the balls. And when he returned, I think we can all agree he was washed up and for the most part a non factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people put Marvin Harrison in the top 5 of all time receivers. I don't think I've seen Steve Smith make the top 25 in any list. See if you can find one other than your own list.

I've attached a link as an example. Harrison is number TWO on this list.http://bleacherreport.com/articles/330608-the-100-greatest-wide-receivers-in-nfl-history-nos-25-1/page/25

You do realize those lists are based on stats right? Give Harrison the QBs Smith had and Harrison wouldn't have those same numbers. I'm not arguing who had a better career, but a list doesn't prove who was a better WR in their prime which is what the OP asked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...