Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Connor's Trade Value


Munch4455

Recommended Posts

Anyone have a guess as to what we can get? I love having high quality back ups as much as anyone, but now that Anderson and TD have been locked up, and Beason likely to follow at some point, wouldn't it be prudent for the Panthers to capitalize on the good season he had last year playing in the middle. I don't see him having a higher value than now, and the only reason I could see keeping him is if Rivera plans to move us to a 3-4 in the future, or if they aren't really sold on the health of TD(but if they werent, why give him a 5 yr deal?). I dunno, just throwing it out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Played 7 games, had 47 tackles, over a whole season thats 107 sacks, and that is including a game where i think he missed a majority of time due to injury(only recorded one tackle). All the ones that would break 100 tackles in a year have already been pretty much picked up(and tbh i think he could be a guy in the right scheme that records 120-130 tackles).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if someone is looking for a 2 down MLB that is awesome vs the run WE HAVE YOUR MAN

buffalo could use someone maybe now that pos is gone

arizona?

i dunno. he could probably play in a 3-4, right? not sure what we could get for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might have to get a little better in pass coverage but I don't see a real reason he couldn't play 3-4. I think he played 4-3 at penn state, but I don't think the assignments are too radically different for ILB's in a 3-4 or the MLB in a 4-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if someone is looking for a 2 down MLB that is awesome vs the run WE HAVE YOUR MAN

buffalo could use someone maybe now that pos is gone

arizona?

i dunno. he could probably play in a 3-4, right? not sure what we could get for him.

Um, at 6'2 I don't think he's the 3-4 type of guy. He's a solid 4-3 guy.

I'd prefer player for player straight up. But if he generates a 4th round or 3rd round pick, I'd say that would be Ideal. Would it be something teams would give up for him? I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd prefer player for player straight up. But if he generates a 4th round or 3rd round pick, I'd say that would be Ideal. Would it be something teams would give up for him? I doubt it.

Dan Connor and a 4th for Darnell Dockett(30 y/o)?

Or

Dan Connor for Adrian Wilson(31 y/o)

I could see that getting done, Gerald Hayes is listed as their starting MLB, 30 years old and not really a standout player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it's possible that he could be traded, since I doubt that he is happy to be relegated back to the bench. . .so in terms of trade value, I would probably say a 3rd-4th. The fact that he is young would probably be worth something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Connor and a 4th for Darnell Dockett?

I could see that getting done, Dockett is 30 now.

Uh, I don't think so. Especially since Dockett is like what? 30? I say Dan Connor for Dockett straight up. They get a young LB, we get a DT that probably has 2-3 years left of football. Which we would plug in right away.

One thing I don't want the Panthers to do ever again, Unless the trade is that good. Is to give away Draft picks. Connor himself is worth Dockett and probably a pick from the Cards. If both teams have needs in each position, then straight up would be the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea guys lets just get rid of a quality back up. that's smart.

His deal is up next off-season. Dude is gonna sign with someone who wants to give him starter money. Don't see why we wouldn't at least shop him around a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just as practical as trading J. Stew

Keep him here, he is solid, and perhaps Rivera changes our defense to 3-4 next offseason, assuming he wants to bring the SD defense scheme in full effect over here. Anderson, Beason, Conner, and Davis on the field at the same time would be official.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Fair enough. I never once said not supporting Tepper makes you a bad fan by the way. I can't stand the guy myself. You on the other hand don't like anything about the team. You can't stand the owner or the coach because his religion doesn't fall in line with how you feel it should so I'm curious why you are even a fan at this point? Hell, you like nothing about the team, why even be a fan these days?  We can go backs and forth about how many games we have been to and measure dicks if you want or but it doesn't matter. I've been to my fair share over the years. Some as a fan and some work related but I bet you have been to more due to my weekends being filled with some work I do at the collegiate level so I probably only average maybe 2-3 games per year tops. You have me beat there im sure. You are probably very correct on us not being the same in anything at all I am quite sure of that. If I'm a "mark" (as you put it) for not liking Tepper and not caring about Canales religion or his political beliefs or letting it have weight on whether or not I like the team then call me a "mark" but you're still a whiny bitch either way.  When you hate everything about leadership from their personalities to their religious beliefs all the way to who they vote for at that point why even be a fan? I can side with you judging by your beliefs that you have made apparent, if you owned and coached the team, I sure as hell would find a new one to support but as you said we are different. Enjoy Norway, it is a beautiful country. Visited last year myself and absolutely loved it.
    • The playing well part, depends on what happens going forward. It could have been a tease that will dig our hole deeper.  In the small picture of one game, probably his best game. Green Bay wasn't as great as people think it was. More like one good quarter. Followed by two games of exactly nothing. 
    • Oh, it was handled horrifically.  Ego got in the way of a plan.  I'm just saying, that he actually probably stumbled into the better outcome/plan.  
×
×
  • Create New...