Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thomas Davis COULD be a FA


Ruff

Recommended Posts

After all of the confusion of whether he is a FA, or isn't, here's a tweet from him:

TD58SDTM Thomas Davis

If there is no long term extension worked out between myself and the team. They will release me to enter FA. Let's hope we get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a FA .. But could he get cut? That's what it sounded like in TD's tweet.

I've re-read it and now it sounds like he's saying he will be cut if they can't agree on a long-term deal.

Why would the Panthers be talking long-term deal with him right now? I guess because they want to lock him up at a discounted price now vs. him having a great season and commanding a much higher price next year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've re-read it and now it sounds like he's saying he will be cut if they can't agree on a long-term deal.

Why would the Panthers be talking long-term deal with him right now? I guess because they want to lock him up at a discounted price now vs. him having a great season and commanding a much higher price next year?

I'm pretty sure it has something to do with the Panthers thinking he's completely healed, that the first injuries to that knee were flukes and bad luck.

On top of that, both Carolina and TD want a long term deal. It'll probably average around 4 million per year, heavy on incentives that could make that jump up a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He could be a FA.

duh.

TD...MEH I am not big on him back to back injuries and we are stacked at the position. If you're against keeping Dwill becasue we have Jstew...TD should be even more of a 'no go' than Dwill with the injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...