Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stewart wants us to hang on to Williams


jtnc

Recommended Posts

I think you will clearly see that we don't as soon as the numbers start coming out.

DWill will get paid, all of you hoping for a 28 year old RB to take a hometown discount need to get real.

This is a business, not a relationship.

im not asking him to take one, we got the money to get guys in help areas plus keep him. not like we are going after a Nmandi or someone who will command 16 mill a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trolling RB is trolling.

Re-read my post. I said I was talking about TWO feature backs, not 1. In their respective duo's, those guys you mentioned would be the ONE feature back in the duo I was referring to. The other guy would NOT be the feature back (Your TJ Ducketts, your James Stewarts', and the other players who may have been great later on, but not necessarily when they were in the duo). And even the other players IN the duo who I would consider the feature back didn't preform to the level that DeAngelo and Jonathan did. There was not one duo that had two 1000 yard rushers, not to mention two 1100 yard rushers.

lol now neverlosethefeeling is taking the "i'm going to be purposefully cryptic and then elaborate depending on the other guy's response because i'm not even sure what the fug i'm talking about right now" strategy

you called them mediocre point blank dummy, stop trying to backtrack now that i've called you out on it and stop purposely speaking ambiguously to cover your ass later

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol now neverlosethefeeling is taking the "i'm going to be purposefully cryptic and then elaborate depending on the other guy's response because i'm not even sure what the fug i'm talking about right now" strategy

you called them mediocre point blank dummy, stop trying to backtrack now that i've called you out on it and stop purposely speaking ambiguously to cover your ass later

It was pretty clear the first time around. My best guess is you ran out of talking points and poo to fling at the wall so you turned to trolling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams is the only sure fire back this team has in regards to staying healthy....

He has been a bit dinged up over the past 2 years (not finishing a season since 2008), was ridden hard at Memphis, and has about (historically) 2, maybe 3 quality seasons left. Not sure I would call him healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fight fight fight...

anyway this is a tough decision imo. I personally would re-sign DeAngelo and trade Stewart down the road when his contract runs out by tagging him then shipping him.

If Newton goes in early he'll need a plethora of options at his disposal and in Chud's likely offense, it will be including multiple RBs, TEs, and WRs.

But the thing is as great as our RBs are, the amount of talent at that position makes it intriguing to see what moves can be made to improve areas of greater need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok people so for future reference when debating with neverlosethefeeling, understand that when he says

I'm talking about having 2 feature backs, not just two mediocre running backs splitting carries.

he really means

Two running backs that were mediocre, but only that year they shared carries, because when they're alone, they're not mediocre. Actually, let me be clear when i say not mediocre on their own, um, can't emphasize that enough, even if i bluntly call them mediocre. I mean when together they are two mediocre backs, but separately they transform into great backs like megatron transforms into a scary tank in revenge of the fallen, and NOT just thinking they're simply mediocre backs just splitting carries like i just said
Link to comment
Share on other sites

arguing semantics as a defense and accusing me of trolling

yea that's gonna make you look smart, and not just a common tits-in-my-avatar mediocre debating forum dork

This really isn't worth responding to, but I'm going to anyways.

It's not arguing semantics, it's clear you were being selective about the players you pointed out in a half-hearted attempt to discredit what I said. If you use the brain I'm giving credit to you for having, you'd know which players I was talking about and which ones I wasn't. The fact that you tried to mis-represent what I said in no way makes what I said any less true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...