Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Players are thinking on filing an injunction...


Ruff

Recommended Posts

... for the free agents and rookies.

In Friday’s ruling allowing the lockout generally to proceed, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit concluded that, regarding the rookies and unsigned free agents, the lockout possibly could be prevented until they sign contracts. Though this ultimately is a distinction without a difference, the process of requiring the league to open the doors for the purposes of signing rookies and free agents before systematically locking each one out after giving them seven-figure-or-more signing bonuses would create, as the NFLPA* lawyers called it in a memo obtained by Sal Paolantonio of ESPN, a “bizarre chaos.” (Is there another kind?)

To trigger that “bizarre chaos,” the named plaintiffs in the Brady class action would be required to file a motion with Judge Susan Nelson, who would then hold a hearing as to whether the lockout should be lifted for players not currently under contract, until they are signed to new contracts.

- PFT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

*IF* this happened it would be crazy and would pro-long this lockout...

Not to mention that the lockout could very well be over by the time it's even heard in court. This should have been done months ago...

Seems to be that anybody who is NOT under contract should be able to do whatever the he'll they want... That's just me though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This coming from Mr. 1045 posts in 3 months.

Kat Williams quote:

"If you gots 2 haters at the beginning of summa, then it should be your personal goal to have at least 10 by the end of summa... Let them mothafugas hate... If they hatin all it means is that you doin somin' right"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention that the lockout could very well be over by the time it's even heard in court. This should have been done months ago...

They couldn't have done this months ago, because they didn't know how the court was going to rule until last Friday, when they actually ruled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...